No News for Third Party Full Frame Canon RF Lenses

The Canon speak? They are coming.

Why they aren't here yet? A mix of licensing fees, mount conversions and manufacturing capabilities of the third-party? I'm only guessing.

Obviously Canon is part of the equation, but I doubt they're the entire reason we don't have them yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The Canon speak? They are coming.

Why they aren't here yet? A mix of licensing fees, mount conversions and manufacturing capabilities of the third-party? I'm only guessing.

Obviously Canon is part of the equation, but I doubt they're the entire reason we don't have them yet.
I’m hoping for a 3rd party 1:1 200-ish mm macro with AF, but only it it outperforms my EF180L. I don’t have any other wishes for lenses, just for V1 sized RF bodies :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Inside a smaller camera market lenses become a more important revenue stream, obviously, since ILC owners probably are more keen to buy more lenses, than in the past. Agreements may include licensing revenues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
If they hadn’t released the recent low budget fixed aperture zooms I would’ve been switching to Sony. Thankfully the 28-70 f2.8 was exactly what I needed.

Although I would still love the Tamron 35-150. Perfect lens for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Upvote 0
For me the lack of internal zooming wide angle drives me crazy. If Canon had a good one, OK, but none is a bit of a worry to me.We wait, we wait and we wait. It is like they don\'t realize that not every body shoots in clean city. Some people shoot in dusty poor world as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
View attachment 222747

I had never looked at the numbers, but a guy on Facebook did the numbers. (I can't confirm the accuracy, but I'm sure it's close if not bang on)

Sure we have EF, but I think people want their core lenses with an RF mount.
Well many of us simply want better versions of our EF mount lenses. All I wanted was a new version of the 50 1.4 which is my most used lens over the last decade and still works great as long as I use it at f2.5 or higher. There isn't an RF equivalent of my EF lenses that I need to buy aside from that 50 and I can't talk about the latest Canon attempt without cursing and raging.

I want/need options because Canon doesn't want to make the lenses that I want. I want the Tamron 35 to 150. I want to be able to carry that one lens to a shoot.

Canon and their bed buddies Apple feel like they're offerings are so good you would have to put yourself through punishment in order to get options from other manufacturers. Thankfully many photographers did that already and simply went to Sony or even nikons latest stuff. it's honestly the only reason Canon has been making so many offensive moves the last 5 years because Sony has been kicking them in the teeth and it's been great to watch but still sad to watch.

I know Panasonic's AF isn't the best but I'm going to L mount. My R5 AF is not as accurate as I would like it to be, Canon Tech told me that my r62 can focus better if I use apertures of 4.5 or 5.6, and the 50 mm situation makes me mad so I'm just going to add another amount to my kit. That's money that could go to Canon but they don't care because quote unquote business reasons.

I never get pissed enough that I would sell my existing Canon gear but I could see a ton of other people doing it because this is just nonsense already.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
Upvote 0
…I could see a ton of other people doing it because this is just nonsense already.
People out of touch with reality often see things that aren’t real.

To clarify, this is reality:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
People out of touch with reality often see things that aren’t real.

To clarify, this is reality:

Ya, but they only sell R100s and it skews the numbers!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Canon never comes out and directly states something...
More than that, Canon representatives, and especially this person have a beautiful skill to say nothing by saying something. I'm curious if he heard what he said and how pathetic it was. He'd better stay silent.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
If they hit the APS-C lineup correctly... Up goes the marketshare

That said... I'd buy the sigma 300-600 immediately.
In all seriousness, I sometimes wonder if the demise of the M format was due in part to the fact some M devices did in fact "hit the APS-C lineup correctly"...I know both of my daughters think so.

But perhaps the APS-C M hit the market at price points that weren't profitable enough.

In particular, the sleek M200 (having many of the features of the M5) and the somewhat bulkier M6MkII (basically a mirrorless, smaller 90D) both deliver a whole lotta bang for the buck/yen/ruble/pound/euro etc...and both were heavily discounted when the M's fate became known to all. I should know, for once I bought at the bottom of the market...

But I marvel at many of the pics posted in the various CR forums--utilizing top-notch glass and the latest electronics, first-rate (dare I say professional-quality?) images are produced.

=====

In the meantime, after COVID-related interruptions, we resumed our annual mid-February trip to central Mexico.

There are no non-stop flights from our airport to either of the airports near our destination in Mexico (layovers in either Dallas or Houston are the norm, and the Customs and re-entry process via Houston Bush [even with no checked bags] literally requires 1.5-2 hours).

Some of the planes utilized by major US-based airlines for these flights are mid-sized Embraer 175 jets (four seats per aisle, two on either side). We do not check bags, and both my wife and I each carry on one piece of standard luggage that (barely) fits in the overhead bins, and a backpack that (barely) fits under the seat.

So the full-frame gear stays home...the M APS-C devices fit quite nicely into a backpack...and I am quite satisfied with the images we brought home.


...and...(a bit of a squared-up edited [M6II + 11-22] image:

two churches.jpg

...this was our fourth visit to this area of Mexico; on all four occasions I do not recall ever seeing photographers with 'better' gear than what was around my neck or in a bag attached to my belt.

I plan to take a hard look at the upcoming R7MkII.

It better be good...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0