Canon Officially Announces the RF 20mm f/1.4L VCM and RF-S 14-30mm f/4-6.3 IS STM PZ

Canon Rumors

Who Dey
Canon Rumors Premium
Jul 20, 2010
12,313
5,192
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, has announced two new lenses designed for social media creators: the RF-S14-30mm F4-6.3 IS STM PZ, Canon’s first RF Lens with Power Zoom optimized for cinematic video, and the RF20mm F1.4 L VCM, a f/1.4 hybrid prime lens that enables high levels of expression across photo and video shooting.

Read the Full Article
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
1.999 € for the 20mm F1.4?? Sry Canon, that's a hard no purchase :/
Although I love the weight on that lens

Of course, with all these great videos features such as Iris control, aperture ring, customizable button and having a unique series with lenses in identical sizes, it really does distinguish itself from the Sigma 20mm DG DN (e-mount). Therefore, the higher price is somewhat justified.

But unfortunately I don't do video and I can´t/ won´t use any of these features. For me personally, it kind of is the disappointment I had expected. For this summer, I'll buy a used copy of the Sigma 20mm F1.4 for EF mount. Since I won´t be carrying this heavy beast everywhere, my hope for the future would either be a 20mm F1.8 similar to the 24mm/ 35mm offerings or a Sigma 20mm F1.4 for RF mount. I don´t believe the second one will come to fruition and I don't see Canon making another (better priced) 20mm F1.4 suited for/ focused on stills photography.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
Gonna wait for RF20L street price to drop below MSRP
How big of a drop are you expecting? 1.999 € is waaaaaay up there... 50mm started at 1.599 € in Germany. So even if you count in cash back (currently 150 €) and you're able to buy it on one of those "10% off for Canon lenses" it'll still put you to 1.289 € for the 50mm. If the 20mm one day is incorporated to the cash back program, it'll likely be around 200 €. So, best case scenario in a year from now is 1.599 € for the 20mm L VCM. Nope, unless one can snatch it up with a great Black Friday refurbished Canon USA deal in Nov, 2026 or beyond, I don´t see this lens becoming "affordable".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Canon went crazy with the pricing. $649 vs £725 for the R50V?
Wooow, even with VAT the price difference is enormous. $649 plus VAT (e.g. 8.25% in Texas) puts it at $702. So the difference is roughly $230 or 33%. I don´t know if Canon has done worse before...

In Germany, the markup to US pricing including VAT is about 16% or 107 €. This is about the usual markup...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
€2019 Too bad the price is so high. Given the price development of this kind of specific RF L-lenses, which have not really dropped over the years, I do not expect to buy this in the short term. It seems to me a nice lens for astro photography. Although reviews have yet to show whether this is actually the case.
 
Upvote 0
Wooow, even with VAT the price difference is enormous. $649 plus VAT (e.g. 8.25% in Texas) puts it at $702. So the difference is roughly $230 or 33%. I don´t know if Canon has done worse before...

In Germany, the markup to US pricing including VAT is about 16% or 107 €. This is about the usual markup...

At the current exchange rate, $649 is £503. Add 20% UK VAT and it's still only £603.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
How big of a drop are you expecting? 1.999 € is waaaaaay up there... 50mm started at 1.599 € in Germany. So even if you count in cash back (currently 150 €) and you're able to buy it on one of those "10% off for Canon lenses" it'll still put you to 1.289 € for the 50mm. If the 20mm one day is incorporated to the cash back program, it'll likely be around 200 €. So, best case scenario in a year from now is 1.599 € for the 20mm L VCM. Nope, unless one can snatch it up with a great Black Friday refurbished Canon USA deal in Nov, 2026 or beyond, I don´t see this lens becoming "affordable".
I'll be travelling in & out Hong Kong every so often. The lack of VAT, and the usual $100~130USD drop in small/non-franchised camera shops are possible.
 
Upvote 0
In Germany, the markup to US pricing including VAT is about 16% or 107 €. This is about the usual markup...
Sorry but it doesn't make sense to compare the prices including VAT between countries with totally different VAT rates.
The correct calculation would be: A net price of $649 would be 603,50€ and Germany adds 19% (!!!) of VAT, so that would be 718€. Therefore the markup is less then 50€ or ~6%.

Interestingly, almost the same applies to the RF20mm: $1699 is 1579€, when adding VAT the German price should be 1879€. The acutal price is again ~6% higher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
Euro 1999 + almost free medical care? That's ok with me!
Saving money on lenses but risking financial ruin whenever you need medical help? Not for me, sorry!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
€2019 Too bad the price is so high. Given the price development of this kind of specific RF L-lenses, which have not really dropped over the years, I do not expect to buy this in the short term. It seems to me a nice lens for astro photography. Although reviews have yet to show whether this is actually the case.
I think that Canon would have mentioned astro use cases in their blurb if it was good enough. Video features etc are more important. Maybe ok for panos where the corners can be stitched out of the final image (similar to the Sigma EF20/1.4)

Only one Australian retailer has a price and is AUD3000 which is basically the USD pricing + 10%GST. At least Canon Australia isn't gouging buyers here vs Europer/UK
I can't justify the price at this time vs my Sigma EF20/1.4 but the Canon version is 60% of the weight and a third of the length.
 
Upvote 0
Exactly, I guess the 14mm 1.4 wouldn’t be a VCM.

Does Anybody else thinks, the VCM idea was a bit stupid? Without the VCM body some lenses would be far shorter.

I really despise the size of the 24-105/2.8. It’s to long, because it uses the 70-200 Z body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Did they mention it about the 24/1.4L VCM?
I don't believe so. The narrower the focal length, the less used for astro... more panels, time and things to go wrong (wind or stitching issues). That is not to say that astro shooters don't use 24mm because they sometimes do plus 28/35 and even 40 but the complexities increase. Sometimes shooters will take a 35mm shot for the sky and blend with wider foreground. Not my style but it is an interesting effect to "zoom" into the milky way details especially if removing the horizon level haziness.

John Rutter even did a sky at 85mm so about 180 panels and the stitching caused many headaches and swore never to do it again!
Trevor Dobson uses 35mm and 50mm but doesn't have a astro modified body so he takes longer exposures with a Ha front filter as well. For a full arch, he will stitch together ~100 images (foreground/sky and Ha).
He uses the longer focal lengths as the Ha front filter is only available for those lenses.
What he is able to achieve with cheaper equipment puts the rest of us to shame! Having access to bortle 1 skies in Western Australia helps immensely.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/trevor_dobson_inefekt69/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0