Canon to start charging for using cameras as webcams


Did you buy a R1 recently? Want to use that as a webcam? You'll need to pay Canon $5/month for the privilege to do so when using Canon's EOS Webcam Utility Suite.

I don't know if I like this move by Canon. Clearly they see Adobe's subscription thing as the basis for something here, buy when you pay Adobe $20 for software, you didn't already buy some other Adobe thing for $10,000.
 

Did you buy a R1 recently? Want to use that as a webcam? You'll need to pay Canon $5/month for the privilege to do so when using Canon's EOS Webcam Utility Suite.

I don't know if I like this move by Canon. Clearly they see Adobe's subscription thing as the basis for something here, buy when you pay Adobe $20 for software, you didn't already buy some other Adobe thing for $10,000.

If you can afford a $2K webcam, I think $5$ /month is no big deal.
 
Upvote 0

Did you buy a R1 recently? Want to use that as a webcam? You'll need to pay Canon $5/month for the privilege to do so when using Canon's EOS Webcam Utility Suite.

I don't know if I like this move by Canon. Clearly they see Adobe's subscription thing as the basis for something here, buy when you pay Adobe $20 for software, you didn't already buy some other Adobe thing for $10,000.
Or you can set the USB mode to UVC/UAC for free and have it work as a webcam: https://cam.start.canon/en/C018/manual/html/UG-06_Network_0300.html

I think the R7 introduced that mode, I know for sure my R8 and R5II have it.

So, no, you do not have to pay Canon a monthly fee to use recent cameras as USB webcams, the functionality is both free-as-in-beer and builtin.
 
Upvote 0
I was glad to find David B's post here...I was going to do it myself but didn't quite know where to put it. Canon General is a good place.

I've posted more than once about Canon's 'free' software that enables many of their top tier cameras (going back decades) to be used as simple webcams.

This 'freeware' has worked well for my wife, enabling the repurposing of an old 40D EF-S/10-18 combo that has found use as a webcam for yoga class instruction from home (via Zoom).

[Note added for clarity: the op here has written about the subscription version of this software...]

I mentioned this previously in the context of a previous CR thread about Canon setting up subscription payments for cropping guides:


One additional post in the same thread:


...and quoting from my own post here:

In the end, the marketplace will decide...as it should. As it always does.

I hope Canon's execs make wise decisions.

=====


I was first made aware of the Roman Zipp post (op in this thread) here:


I daresay that arstechnica (one of my favorite sites...along with CR!) has readership numbers that dwarf those of Mr. Zipp and his posts (good as they are).

In fact, I think arstechnica is that rare science and technology webzine that is profitable. Highly profitable.

=====

One of the life's pleasures (fire away!) is reading arstechnica comment sections (smart people)...and the comment section here does not disappoint.

At least one of you reading this right now was, I think, introduced to the word 'enshittification' in a Canon subscription-related post on CR.

In the ars comment section to the article linked above, as well as a very lengthy and more-than-occasionally off-topic-as-usual reddit concerned with Mr. Zipp's original post...the word 'enshittification' is used dozens of times...enough to convince me (I think, for the purposes of discussion)...

...that Canon is deciding poorly when trying to set up a subscription model for their fully-featured webcam software.

Their decision here has set off a firestorm of publicity and criticism, from tech-types that Canon should want as customers.

In other words, the marketplace will decide.

This kerfuffle is not quite a Streisand Effect (not at all, actually), but sort of (in a way).

And for those of you who are unfamiliar with the Streisand Effect, well...in the process of setting up this post, I learned something completely new: The Cobra Effect!


"During the British reign in India there was growing concern about the incidence of cobra bites in Delhi. The governor there decided to offer a bounty for every dead cobra submitted to him. At first this worked well and a large number of snakes were killed for the reward. Gradually though business-minded people began to breed cobras for the income. Once it became apparent that this was happening the same Governor abandoned the reward scheme. This caused the cobra breeders to set all their now worthless snakes free. Thus the frequency of bites rose. So the Cobra Effect happens when a proposed solution to a problem has exactly the opposite impact to that intended."

...fascinating stuff (whether true or not it is a great read ;) ).

=====

Finally, I wonder if the decision-makers at Canon are aware of The Streisand Effect (and things like it). If they are not, then that is part of the problem here.

EDIT: worth a look. Definitely worth a look.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0