Specifically it's these chunks of silicon abutting the sensor.
View attachment 219618
That’s ’partially stacked’ in the way that getting a 7 out of a 100 on a test is ‘partially an A+’.
Upvote
0
Specifically it's these chunks of silicon abutting the sensor.
View attachment 219618
Yeah it definitely sounds like something the marketing folks coined. I imagine the engineers would have just called it a low latency package or something. Seems more analagous to the 'chiplet' design being used in newer CPUs and such
That’s ’partially stacked’ in the way that getting a 7 out of a 100 on a test is ‘partially an A+’.
Thanks for the photo....Yeah it definitely sounds like something the marketing folks coined. I imagine the engineers would have just called it a low latency package or something. Seems more analagous to the 'chiplet' design being used in newer CPUs and such
Canon have allowed models to stay in the line up for some time once superseded but the 5Div and 1DXiii are still there.I think there's a decent chance the R3 is simply discontinued. If it does live on as a mark II, I could see them giving it the R5II sensor.
I think the complaining started with the 10D actually, long before the 7D. Complaining never goes out of styleHonest question…why do you keep buying Canon gear? It seems all you do is complain about your Canon cameras, ever since at least the 7D.
I think the R3 will stay on as the budget R1, with more and more aggressive pricing over the next year or two. I think by the time the R3 is EOL it will be selling for less than USD$3700. Will continue to be a great option for event shooters who don't need 45mp or R1 specs.I think there's a decent chance the R3 is simply discontinued. If it does live on as a mark II, I could see them giving it the R5II sensor.
Either way, as I noted earlier, there is already some precedent for the 6-series body sharing its sensor with the pro body (R6 and 1DXIII back then).
Specifically it's these chunks of silicon abutting the sensor. Seems to let them increase the speed without it being as complicated to build as a true stacked sensor. Readout speed is about the same as the R6II (~14.5ms), though it is 14-bit instead of 12-bit, so there is still ~4x as much data being transferred in the same amount of time.
View attachment 219618
Plus the R1/R5ii AF system, and throw in a variable pre-capture duration - not asking for muchJust give me the R3 sensor in an R6 body with no bit penalties for shooting in silent, along with a blackout free viewfinder and I'm in for two.
TBH, it wouldn't surprise me if it gets delayed furthermore, to Q2 or Q3.... It now looks like the EOS R6 Mark III will be announced in Q1 of 2025, ...
There are still a lot of people on the internet waiting for their preorder to be filled, and you’re saying Canon is deliberately refusing to sell cameras because they are not selling? That’s a self fulfilling prophecy!I am suspicious of all this supply chain shortage speak. I don't want to seem like a downer, but I seem to think that sales of the R5 MK II and the R1 were just poor and supply chain issues are an easy way to navigate poor reports. Also, more folks are squeezing pennies than ever before because of the economy. But that's just my 2C. Could be very wrong, though.
I suppose it is the other way 'round:I am suspicious of all this supply chain shortage speak. I don't want to seem like a downer, but I seem to think that sales of the R5 MK II and the R1 were just poor and supply chain issues are an easy way to navigate poor reports. Also, more folks are squeezing pennies than ever before because of the economy. But that's just my 2C. Could be very wrong, though.
That doesn't mean it isn't there.... There is simply 0 urgency from anyone that I know personally to buy those cameras. ...
And time will tell if the Bielefeld conspiracy is true.Well, time will tell us just how popular the R5 MK II is.
Who is the target for your conspiracy theory? Customers who will think, “Oooo look, this camera is so amazing that it’s sold out everywhere, I better order one now and wait months for it?” I mean, not your your friends, they’re too smart to fall for that so they’re not interested…but those other rubes who will fall for it.…I seem to think that sales of the R5 MK II and the R1 were just poor and supply chain issues are an easy way to navigate poor reports.
I would think a mark II rarely gets as much interest. And some of the headline stats (eg resolution) didn't change. But I have no idea how to judge hype. And to what extent "buzz" generates sales is something that's been pondered on these forums for years.I do get the sense there has been less hype for the R5II than I expected. There seemed to be more buzz around for recent releases from the other companies.
You mean the big, regular reviewers who make money when people buy gear from links on their site?It’s an absolute piece of shit to be honest and I bought it based on all the reviews I saw, and these are the big regular ones.
R3 with R5 II sensor and improved eye control focus would be a nearly perfect camera imho.I think there's a decent chance the R3 is simply discontinued. If it does live on as a mark II, I could see them giving it the R5II sensor.
Either way, as I noted earlier, there is already some precedent for the 6-series body sharing its sensor with the pro body (R6 and 1DXIII back then).
Specifically it's these chunks of silicon abutting the sensor. Seems to let them increase the speed without it being as complicated to build as a true stacked sensor. Readout speed is about the same as the R6II (~14.5ms), though it is 14-bit instead of 12-bit, so there is still ~4x as much data being transferred in the same amount of time.
View attachment 219618
Yeah an r3 body with R5 ii sensor and a larger buffer would be a near perfect camera and would make me seriously consider taking a big loss on the R5 ii to upgrade.R3 with R5 II sensor and improved eye control focus would be a nearly perfect camera imho.
R3 ergonomics are really great!
An R6 III this year? Wouldn't it make more sense to produce all the R5 IIs they could sell?