If you go by DxO, dynamic range is a very important factor in lens performance. So, maybe don’t go by DxO.
If you go by DxO, lenses are also rated in Megapixels...
Upvote
0
If you go by DxO, dynamic range is a very important factor in lens performance. So, maybe don’t go by DxO.
Sounds like you want an R3.
The price has come down a lot.
Nikon is the only OEM offering basically the same camera in integrated and non-intergrated grip formats... both at competitive pricing. Only they will know the volumes of each to determine which is preferred by pro/non-pro alike.So, by that rationale, real pros don't want integrated grips and only "photographer wannabe" really want integrated grips.
The a7siii is used by astro photographers for it's low light performance.Not very many people use the a7S III for photography.
12 MP is perfect for 4K video.
Now that the FX3 is out, not very many people buy one at all.
It is not that 12 MP is unusable, but no one wants to pay that much for it.
Older cameras with 12 MP or less sell very well, just for a lot less money.
Although MP size and low light performance are not correlated anymore, the a7Siii has very good low light performance. Useful for astro work or maybe night/stage events where that is the primary issue.I just wondered if the a7Siii was an example of a camera that had too few megapixels ;-)
The a7siii is used by astro photographers for it's low light performance.
Shooting panos will remove some of the low mp issues but in reality, very few people are printing large these days.
I am not sure if Sony will release an updated version as it is getting old (by Sony product life cycle) at 5 years.
Canon surveys pros when they take suggestions for the 1 series.The 1-Series is not aimed at a plurality of pros nor is it aimed at a plurality of amateurs, or even a plurality of all Canon buyers. It's aimed a plurality of shooters, whether pro, semi-pro, or amateur who need/want speed and AF accuracy over all else in a body rugged enough to use to club someone to death and then use to take their photo after and aren't deterred by the high cost to get that.
Sony cameras are always perfect.I just wondered if the a7Siii was an example of a camera that had too few megapixels ;-)
It is pretty obvious that the Z 8 far outsells the Z 9.Nikon is the only OEM offering basically the same camera in integrated and non-intergrated grip formats... both at competitive pricing. Only they will know the volumes of each to determine which is preferred by pro/non-pro alike.
What can I say... we like our night skies black!If printing using inkjet or dye sublimation, astro work really uses the ink/pigment like nothing else.
We would assume so but they would know what drives the buyer justification for the price difference vs size?It is pretty obvious that the Z 8 far outsells the Z 9.
Only Nikon knows by how much.
I think that they would be interested in their buyer demographics but there will always be a % that buy without expecting to make money from their purchases. The rest would be defined somehow as "pro" I guess.I am not sure that Nikon even knows or cares what percentage of Z 9 users are pro.
Canon surveys pros when they take suggestions for the 1 series.
For the rest of the line, they take suggestions from any Canon users.
It wouldn't seem prudent that survey cards/emails are used for features on one hand and input from very few "pros" on the other. Nor just input from internal marketing employees even if those people are located in different parts of the world.They send multiple choice form surveys to a lot of users. Questions like, "Pick two from the following list (of 8-10 or more features) that you consider the most important when selecting a camera." Or statements with a range of numbers with "0" being 'strongly disagree' and "5" being 'strongly agree'. (These days they're digital, but in the 1990s they used to be hard copy.) The results are aggregated and I get the distinct impression from listening to those who are more in a position to know than I am that those making decisions in Japan mostly just see the aggregate numbers.
I was told years ago by a very high ranking Canon Technical Advisor in the U.S. that Japan takes free form suggestions regarding the 1-Series seriously from only a few handfuls of pros that are closely affiliated with Canon. I've also been told by a PJ acquaintance who shoots a lot of major college sports within a certain radius of his location for the national media conglomerate who owns the local publication for which he works that a lot of top level pros in the sports world know who some of those shooters are, and will offer suggestions to them in hopes they will pass them on rather than contacting Canon directly and their suggestion never being seen by anyone with any authority to consider it.