My thoughts exactly!Ok but what about the RF 35mm f/1.2L?![]()
Are you using the R7/50 1.2 for portraits?With so few lenses on the docket I doubt we’ll see much attention to RF-S but I really would be interested in seeing an R7 mark II that has a processor capable of keeping up with the frame rate so that we don’t have autofocus jumping on and off the subject.
I’ve been using the R7 in the studio with the RF 50 1.2 and holy crap it’s sharp and beautiful. Level of detail is unreal. A slight bit of purple fringing pops up under the strobes but that’s easily fixed in post.
I hope not, otherwise I would start whining for a 50mm and 85mm 1.0My thoughts exactly!
I know it wont happen but imagine if they would surprise EVERYONE and create RF 35mm f 1.0 L USM halo lens.
I'm just trying to imagine the size and weight of an 85mm F1.0.I hope not, otherwise I would start whining for a 50mm and 85mm 1.0
But boy I'd love that!
I feel Canon is really afraid Nikon more than Sony.Sony releases A9iii : Canon sleeps
Nikon buys RED that shares Canon patents : CaNoN AWAKES
SO... Will there be 24-50/2.8 and 16-28/2.8 to kill off the necessity of 3rd parties f2.8 zooms. And pleased the bitxhy enthusiasts as a side effect.
I believe Canon follow their own schedule when releasing/developing lenses.I feel Canon is really afraid Nikon more than Sony.
From Camera side, even Sony keeps releasing many version fullframe cameras to keep their fullframe selling every year. Canon would not change their plan to release more camera. You can see Canon has not released high resolution after 5Ds.
But releasing lens, Canon doesn't want to lose to Nikon. I really feel Canon has not released RF35mm f1.2 because Nikon has not released.
They both delay the release date.
I am sure if Nikon releases, Canon will release.
If Sony really release 24-70 f2.0 this year, I think Canon will release 28-70f2.0 mark 2 and 70-150mm f2.0 this year.
But Canon keeps saying that they can't produce enough lens every year. If they release 7 more in year. Many lens will keep out of stock.
The target audience is investors. Perhaps they are impressed by glowing redI will never understand how a company that markets to creative professionals makes presentations that look like they were done by a 14 year old who just pirated photoshop for the first time.
"whoa, I can make words that GLOW RED"
This has been the case for most high-end camera products, not just Canon’s. For the past several years, if you want a new high-end camera or lens, the best thing is to either preorder it from a major shop (B&H, Adorama) within an hour or two of the announcement, or if you have a local retailer connect with them before the announcement and see if they’ll put you on their list.How about adopting the strategy of being able to deliver the cameras & lenses you “release.” Frustrated here in Vegas waiting on 10-20mm & 100-300mm … try to support local shop but B&H still seem to have upper hand…
To be honest, I'd rather those lenses be big and heavy than small but relying on heavy software correctionsI'm just trying to imagine the size and weight of an 85mm F1.0.
Couldn't be worse than the Sigma 1.4/40mm Sumo Deluxe...
thing of beautyI just swapped my 85 1.4 Art for the 105 1.4 and "big and heavy" now took a totally new meaning
View attachment 215421
That's rookie numbers. There was a 0.75 lens a long time ago that Canon made, but it was for xray...My thoughts exactly!
I know it wont happen but imagine if they would surprise EVERYONE and create RF 35mm f 1.0 L USM halo lens.
If you only need one or two lenses, ok.To be honest, I'd rather those lenses be big and heavy than small but relying on heavy software corrections
This is just my opinion.
I like to bring three and a tripod.If you only need one or two lenses, ok.
But definitely not for hiking with half a dozen heavy bricks!
When hiking?I like to bring three and a tripod.
HaHaHa!That's rookie numbers. There was a 0.75 lens a long time ago that Canon made, but it was for xray...