Canon EOS R1 Specifications [CR2]

Indeed, depending on the feelings you are trying to communicate with you image...

In the distant past I used to do HDR images by taking multiple exposures with the king of DR (not) 5D mkII.
I used a partially manual method by manually mixing different versions of the same images obtained by using the different tone mapping options in PS. My last step was always to dial contrast back in. This way I was reducing the DR a bit, but not only the results were more of my liking, they were also less HDR-esque, which is something I did not like apart from very specific cases (e.g. old rusty car relics).
Here are some examples of mine (stuff I did years ago - my tastes have changed a bit) that I hope will illustrate what I am explaining above - apologies for the off-topic departure

IMG_9677H.jpg
IMG_6546hP.jpg
IMG_2076.jpg
IMG_5633H.jpg
IMG_0333H.jpg
IMG_6600HP.jpg
IMG_9705.jpg
IMG_9396H.jpg
IMG_9622M.jpg
IMG_9727H.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users
Upvote 0
Here are some examples of mine (stuff I did years ago - my tastes have changed a bit) that I hope will illustrate what I am explaining above - apologies for the off-topic departure

View attachment 214370
View attachment 214371
View attachment 214372
View attachment 214373
View attachment 214374
View attachment 214375
View attachment 214376
View attachment 214377
View attachment 214378
View attachment 214379
So close to perfection! If only those photos were taken with a 35mm f/1.2.......
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Upvote 0
Why does Sony not offer integrated vertical grip on its flagships, while Canon and Nikon do? Are they targeting the same buyer, or are they targeting buyers with different priorities?
What is interesting is that Canon (and Nikon?) has reduced the size/weight (-16% volume/-400gms) of the R3 body vs the 1DXiii. I don't think that anyone would say that the body needs to be unnecessarily heavy but good to balance larger lenses. The smaller but still ergonomic R3 would have provided good feedback to Canon if the R1 size would be similar or not.
 
Upvote 0
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Yes but in some ways not really at ~50% higher price, the RP still could be considered as a separate model completely. Certainly not today's tech but still excellent value for money in my opinion.
The RP launched at $1300, the R8 at $1500. Both saw discounts of $200-300 within the first year after launch. Today you might consider that the street price of the RP makes it a separate model, but IMO that's not a fair comparison. The 1D X III lists for $6500 and the 1D X II now lists for $3000, the former is clearly the successor to the latter despite the >100% price difference today, and I'd argue the same is true for the RP and R8 though the difference is much smaller.

The R8 even uses the same grip extension. Practically speaking, it IS the RP II, they've just fit it into the newer nomenclature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Upvote 0
Of course the above is just a guess and the exact difference is very hard or maybe impossible to measure without getting an uncooked raw from the R5. It's very sad that Magic Lantern has been abandoned.
The Canon engineers has really been restricted to what they were able to provide on the 5Diii, Magic Lantern blew open the possibilities. The work involved for Digic X on R5 would probably not provide the same level of features that are not already there. One thing I miss is a ETTR option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The RP launched at $1300, the R8 at $1500. Both saw discounts of $200-300 within the first year after launch. Today you might consider that the street price of the RP makes it a separate model, but IMO that's not a fair comparison. The 1D X III lists for $6500 and the 1D X II now lists for $3000, the former is clearly the successor to the latter despite the >100% price difference today, and I'd argue the same is true for the RP and R8 though the difference is much smaller.

The R8 even uses the same grip extension. Practically speaking, it IS the RP II, they've just fit it into the newer nomenclature.
We've had this discussion before and I don't consider launch price to be relevant to what is in the market today. Coming up to a year since R8 release and the RP is still available. Why not leave it as a price/performance segment if it is still selling and making money.
 
Upvote 0
I know right? Instead of a lowly EF 24-105 f/4L IS (mkI)! :eek: the horror! (most of them at least)
Don't worry, in my opinion, with expanding dynamic range, it's better to use pan focus. The way you tightened the contrast also reduces the artificial feeling I get with higher dynamic range photos. So, I think you should feel good about them and I enjoyed seeing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0