No R cameras beside the R3 have GPS builtin, you'll need to use a GP-E2 in the hot shoe or the Canon Connect app on your phone and failing that, an external solution if you want to geotag your pictures.
Just look at the feature set on the rumoured R6 II vs R3, very far from being the same.
The distinguishing feature of the R3 is the stacked BSI sensor, it's literally the first thing they talk about in all of the marketing materials and it's their only camera to feature this technology. You can get toughness and handling in other Canon DSLRs, and eye controlled focus in their film cameras.
The 1DX III was only out a year before the R6.
Correct, it was a new sensor and a new lowpass filter in the 1DxIII. The filter alone was a big improvement, it preserved much more fine detail compared to older sensors.
It's routes are pretty old, not completely different to what it was in the 1DX II, except a new filter and a Digic X processor squeezing a lot more out of it.
I'm skeptical about how expensive the R3 sensor really is. The OM-1 has a stacked BSI Sony sensor, although obviously a smaller one, in a $2200 camera body and rumor has it that OMD is about to put the same sensor into a $1600 body.
Apples to oranges, that stacked sensor isn't the most state of the art. 1/125s readout speed is the slowest, slower than 1/160s in the first-gen A9 from 2017. So it wouldn't be surprising to see it in a cheaper product. The R3 sensor is 1/200s despite being four times larger.
There are stacked BSI sensors in lots of smartphones, too. It’s not just about sensor size, larger sensors have disproportionately lower yields. A FF sensor costs significantly more than 4x what a m4/3 sensor costs to produce.
Oh hey narcissist, you kids always think you have the answers as well as thinking you know all and I just through a possibility out into the ether knowing that you of all people would respond and make some ad hominem attack and sir you did. Good job you are predictable, now to my comment of canon using its sensors in other cameras.Your argument is that Canon made such a vast excess of sensors for a $6000 camera aimed at the top of the market that they have enough of them sitting around —just the fabricated silicon, not assembled into R3 bodies— to support the production of a $2500 camera aimed at the middle-low end of the enthusiast market that will most likely sell more units in a year than the R3 will sell in its life cycle.
Are you onto something? Or just on something?
Well, I hope the R5 mark one camera don't all suddenly stop working when the R5II launches.
So, now you're saying that Canon made extra sensors for the 1DXII then used them in the C200, instead? What did they do to those extra 1DXII sensors, just cut them down to Super 35 size and stick them in the C200?
Or maybe you don't remember correctly.
It would if it were made by Adobe. I opened PS one day when not connected to the internet and Adobe tried to delete the app as it thought my account had expired.
You need to connect to the internet every 2 weeks to keep your Adobe stuff working
Maybe Apple can add contacting Adobe to the iPhone Emergency SOS via Satellite feature.You need to connect to the internet every 2 weeks to keep your Adobe stuff working
