I am not surprised. At this time, whenever a new product is released I expect it to be in short supply and always order on the day of the announcement within minutes of the announcement becoming official.
Upvote
0
You can also add (after market) extension tubes to the 100-500. That lens works very well with them. You can also add the MR-14EXII macro flash using a 72mm step down ring on the 100-500 with no vignetting at close range.In theory this RF70-200Z + RF 2x extender would give me a 400 f/5.6 with a 0.6x magnification ratio, which beats both the RF100-400 (f/8, 0.41x) and the RF100-500L (f/7.1, 0.34x), but that's not something I can or want to spend €4000 on. It is something I want to try, though, so I'm going to keep an eye on a rental next spring.
I did that years back with a new iPhone launch (back when that meant something). Never again, there were some weird people in that particular queue.Yes... I will be waiting outside before the store opens. I may bring back pitching a tent before a product launch. I'll probably be pretty lonely though.
Which lenses are you referring to?Despite initial responses from reviewers, direct comparison with the L II just proved that the lens is great modern optics with somehow good value. The II L perhaps was significantly better corrected in terms of distortion and offered slightly more charming bokeh. VCM is crisper in terms of resolution and offer better contrast where it matters the most, so overall, it\'s a great offering.
35mm, they changes the initial title of this article...Which lenses are you referring to?
The resolution graphs between these lenses (RF 35mm f1.4 VCM L and EF 35mm f1.4 L) are so similar that it is unlikely that there will be any noticable difference in sharpness between using thse two lenses in real world photographs. The RF gains the simplicity of a native lens, which will not require an adapter. However, the newer RF lens is in fact heavier and longer than the EF lens. These differences are negated if you are using the EF lens on a RF mount camera with an adapter. The EF lens can be bought in the UK a bit cheaper than the new RF lens but that may change once supply meets the demand and the price drops a bit. The other issue with the Rf version is that it's not using the BR goo optic that was first used in the EF 35mm mk II version. It's a bit odd that it was ommited from the RF lens and does give the EF lens a slight advantage in certain shooting conditions.Despite initial responses from reviewers, direct comparison with the L II just proved that the lens is great modern optics with somehow good value. The II L perhaps was significantly better corrected in terms of distortion and offered slightly more charming bokeh. VCM is crisper in terms of resolution and offer better contrast where it matters the most, so overall, it\'s a great offering.
Could this be the generation of cameras/lenses that sees Canon outsourcing to China/Thailand to keep up with demand? I know Sony, Nikon, Fuji all do (without any effect on quality imo) and Canon has admirably kept manufacturing of the high end prosumer stuff on-shore for as long as they have.
Agree. While the 70-200 Z MTF curves are fantastic, the pricing is ridiculous. However, Canon has stated in a quarterly call (ie to investors by implicitly also to all their customers) that they intend to make up in lost revenue from lower volume by charging more per product sold.I m full into Canon... don't get me wrong here! But I don't support those stellar prices... will stick with my spartanious EF 70-200 2.8 non-IS
The old technical term for this approach is called the "super profit zone". Where you sell less items for a higher price making more profit for less effort.Agree. While the 70-200 Z MTF curves are fantastic, the pricing is ridiculous. However, Canon has stated in a quarterly call (ie to investors by implicitly also to all their customers) that they intend to make up in lost revenue from lower volume by charging more per product sold.
The Nikon 70-180/2.8 lens isn’t comparable to this new Canon lens. The Nikon optic is a rebadged Tamron lens. It has inferior build, optics, af and no IS system.TBH... this lens is really expensive for a 70-200 2.8.
I have checked the current Nikon sales and you can get a ~700g 70-180 2.8 for around 1k€ with TC compatiblity?! And the Z8 can be bought for around 3600€ new... and is available "_".
I m full into Canon... don't get me wrong here! But I don't support those stellar prices... will stick with my spartanious EF 70-200 2.8 non-IS
Glad you were able to get one. You should be all set with the R1 and a new 70-200 mm f2.8 lens. Have fun with the new equipment and take some amazing photos.I've had a fairly lucky week, managed to pick this up in white from BH today, it did not last long in stock it seems.