scyrene said:springle said:I am dismayed that Canon would release a FF mirrorless body instead of working on ______. Zero interest for me
Canon already makes several APS-C mirrorless bodies. What does their releasing a FF one have to do with you, if you're not interested? What is the point of this post?
The Fat Fish said:I wonder how the 4K will be crippled in this one.
No 4K at all?
Poor codec?
Horrific crop?
No DPAF?
All are possible, at least one or two are likely. The wait for this camera is the only thing keeping me from jumping ship. This camera has to be competitive.
50/1.4ahsanford said:scyrene said:springle said:I am dismayed that Canon would release a FF mirrorless body instead of working on ______. Zero interest for me
Canon already makes several APS-C mirrorless bodies. What does their releasing a FF one have to do with you, if you're not interested? What is the point of this post?
+1. See edit above.
ahsanford said:scyrene said:springle said:I am dismayed that Canon would release a FF mirrorless body instead of working on ______. Zero interest for me
Canon already makes several APS-C mirrorless bodies. What does their releasing a FF one have to do with you, if you're not interested? What is the point of this post?
+1. See edit above. Would be helpful context -- without it, you're just shaking your fist in the air.
- A
scyrene said:The Fat Fish said:I wonder how the 4K will be crippled in this one.
No 4K at all?
Poor codec?
Horrific crop?
No DPAF?
All are possible, at least one or two are likely. The wait for this camera is the only thing keeping me from jumping ship. This camera has to be competitive.
Yaaaawn. "Jump ship" or don't. More likely, you'll just keep injecting your negativity into these forums.
Mt Spokane Photography said:I hope its a professional model and stays away from SD cards. They all are really slow once they have been used and formatted, speeds go to a crawl. They are too small to use with gloves on in cold weather. I have one in the 2nd slot of my 5D MK IV, but because of their slow speed, it only gets used for small jpeg files.Antono Refa said:Chaitanya said:Hoping for EF mount, Dual sd slots with atleast one Uhs-2.
Are there better than UHS-II cards / readers out there?
ahsanford said:Maiaibing said:Reference: ?Kit. said:4. Sony actually loses money per unit sold, but wants to keep the presence of its brand on the market.
...that's kind of how they sold PS3 and PS4, correct? Sell it at cost (or in the PS's case, a loss initially I believe) to get folks to adopt the system and bring revenue in through other channels, correct?
It's conjecture that any of the above (1-3 that I offered) are happening, of course. Just a guess.
- A
stevelee said:Then there was the car dealer on TV who advertised that they lost money on every deal, but they made up for it with volume.
tpatana said:Mt Spokane Photography said:I hope its a professional model and stays away from SD cards. They all are really slow once they have been used and formatted, speeds go to a crawl. They are too small to use with gloves on in cold weather. I have one in the 2nd slot of my 5D MK IV, but because of their slow speed, it only gets used for small jpeg files.Antono Refa said:Chaitanya said:Hoping for EF mount, Dual sd slots with atleast one Uhs-2.
Are there better than UHS-II cards / readers out there?
Agreed.
Give me (about in order of importance):
-EF Mount
-superior IQ w/ 30-50Mpix
-<$3000
-CF+SD or CFast+SD, or maybe CFast+CF (but that'd take lot of space)
-close to 5D size, maybe take the pentaprism away. With optional grip to make it 1D size
And I'll buy one.
UK DID sold the London Bridge to US3kramd5 said:stevelee said:Then there was the car dealer on TV who advertised that they lost money on every deal, but they made up for it with volume.
Haha, he probably has a bridge to sell too.
The Fat Fish said:The wait for this camera is the only thing keeping me from jumping ship. This camera has to be competitive.
dak723 said:scyrene said:The Fat Fish said:I wonder how the 4K will be crippled in this one.
No 4K at all?
Poor codec?
Horrific crop?
No DPAF?
All are possible, at least one or two are likely. The wait for this camera is the only thing keeping me from jumping ship. This camera has to be competitive.
Yaaaawn. "Jump ship" or don't. More likely, you'll just keep injecting your negativity into these forums.
Yes, Just another Sony plant or a troll.
ahsanford said:unfocused said:Reading the answers, I'm pretty convinced that I won't be switching to mirrorless anytime soon.
I don't see it as switching at all -- my SLR is not going anywhere. I see mirrorless as another FF option to do the things my SLR cannot: take up less space in my bag, liveview 10x (or peaking) with MF glass through the VF, adapt old glass, etc.
It also may be the first FF body with on-chip ADC + a tilty-flippy, a combination Canon rather surprisingly does not offer in 2018.
- A
CanonFanBoy said:dak723 said:scyrene said:The Fat Fish said:I wonder how the 4K will be crippled in this one.
No 4K at all?
Poor codec?
Horrific crop?
No DPAF?
All are possible, at least one or two are likely. The wait for this camera is the only thing keeping me from jumping ship. This camera has to be competitive.
Yaaaawn. "Jump ship" or don't. More likely, you'll just keep injecting your negativity into these forums.
Yes, Just another Sony plant or a troll.
All together now: Jump! Jump! Jump! Jump! Please jump! etc.
CanonFanBoy said:but now that I think about it I'm not sure exactly how helpful that would be. 50mm x10? Hand holding would be awful for trying to focus at 10X, I think. I'm imagining that it would feel like trying to hold a 500mm lens still to focus... jumping all over the place.
transpo1 said:CanonFanBoy said:dak723 said:scyrene said:The Fat Fish said:I wonder how the 4K will be crippled in this one.
No 4K at all?
Poor codec?
Horrific crop?
No DPAF?
All are possible, at least one or two are likely. The wait for this camera is the only thing keeping me from jumping ship. This camera has to be competitive.
Yaaaawn. "Jump ship" or don't. More likely, you'll just keep injecting your negativity into these forums.
Yes, Just another Sony plant or a troll.
All together now: Jump! Jump! Jump! Jump! Please jump! etc.
And a lot of the negativity in this forum comes from those call others trolls when they request a certain feature. Just because you don’t need it does not mean it’s not a valid request for a Canon product.
dak723 said:transpo1 said:CanonFanBoy said:dak723 said:scyrene said:The Fat Fish said:I wonder how the 4K will be crippled in this one.
No 4K at all?
Poor codec?
Horrific crop?
No DPAF?
All are possible, at least one or two are likely. The wait for this camera is the only thing keeping me from jumping ship. This camera has to be competitive.
Yaaaawn. "Jump ship" or don't. More likely, you'll just keep injecting your negativity into these forums.
Yes, Just another Sony plant or a troll.
All together now: Jump! Jump! Jump! Jump! Please jump! etc.
And a lot of the negativity in this forum comes from those call others trolls when they request a certain feature. Just because you don’t need it does not mean it’s not a valid request for a Canon product.
Request a certain feature???
Here's how a mature adult requests a feature or discusses features rationally on an internet forum:
"I sure hope the new camera has 4K. I'd also like to see such-and-such codec because (actual reason given). While it might be cropped, I hope the crop factor is less than XX, and of course, I would hope to see DPAF.
Here's how a troll does it:
"I wonder how the 4K will be crippled in this one."
If you don't see the difference between a mature adult who actually want to discuss things or give their personal wish list and someone who intentionally over-exaggerates and used inflammatory language (the definition of a troll), then I guess I can't make it any more clear.