Expect more delays from Canon for both cameras and lenses

[koenkooi]

[...]One alternative would be Capture One Pro, since they still offer also a non-subscription option, or DxO as the other one. I know some pro photographers, they all use Capture One, but DxO's denoising tools are in particular intriguing for me. I have e.g. thousands of very nice images of purple herons (mating, breeding, feeding their chicks), a rare bird in Germany and the colony I knew is gone now. But most of them are shot with my old 7DII, and I'd love to postprocess those RAW files again with denoising. My main problem? Time available to do this...

DxO PureRAW 4 now allows you to tweak more settings, like the amount of noise removal and sharpening, which was good enough for me to replace the complete DxO PhotoLab package. It works very well on my 7D files, so your 7DII files should get a nice boost as well.

The trial version works full-featured, without watermarks for 30 days, so you could try a handful of images and if you like it, queue up all of them and let your computer work on it over the weekend

 

[Sleepy Joe]

So you’re still unwilling to support your claims with any actual evidence. Manifestly, that’s because you are unable to do so. Your pathetic attempts at deflection are as sad as they are trite.

Let me remind you of the first sentence of your first post:

That is a statement I know to be unequivocally false. So right from the start, your blatant lie cost you the respect I typically afford someone by default.

My response was mildly condescending, “It's cute that you think a lack of real information will quell the whining in response to a 24 MP rumor.” Intentionally so, because I give what I get and you began with condescension (“You do realize that…”).

I also quoted a prior post of mine pointing out that I’m fully aware that not all information posted here is true (as should be obvious to anyone with a modicum of intelligence given the site name). You have yet to support your very first claim that nothing here is true (reposted Canon statements notwithstanding).

As for the rest of your diatribe, that’s as blatantly false as your initial claim. I certainly don’t think I’m better or more knowledgeable than everyone else. I do have experience in optics and business, both of which are relevant here. There are plenty of people in this world who I know are smarter than I am, including a few here on this forum…people who I respect greatly. However, you are not among them.

You obviously came here seeking to agitate, and when you got the reaction you were aiming for, you started tossing insults and playing the victim card. Reminds me of a certain recently convicted felon with hands best sized to shoot with an EOS M 100. Probably someone who inspires you.

Regardless, this ‘discussion’ has become pointless. Feel free to reply or not, you’re not worth any more of my time.

Lol, now you are walking back on your statements. ONLY one with information about Canon products is CANON!!!! It's just that simple. There is no inside informants, it's all a fake the supposed inside information here. This site was created as a gag site. But you have taken it to be way more than that and believe somehow they have inside or extra information when they don't.