We should hand them an original Nikon D1 from 1999. Scary skin tones in the jpgs at any ISO.
Upvote
0
I may have been wrong about the EOS R3 official announcement date
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
It will be interesting to hear if any of the previous folks who have provided "insider" info to CR suddenly get fired or transferred to other duties. This could have been a ploy to find out who is leaking info. Just being suspicious.
Upvote
0
It is also anticipated by many wildlife photographers and high resolution is beneficial for that application.
Upvote
0
You make an excellent point. My first DSLR was a Nikon D200. Anyone who complains about high ISO noise on the R5 (or any current camera) should pickup a 10+ year old DSLR.
Upvote
0
In the mean time...
Anyone seen this..
www.photographyblog.com
Anyone seen this..
Canon EOS R3 Review | Photography Blog
Expert review of the Canon EOS R3 full-frame mirrorless camera with full-size sample photos.
www.photographyblog.com
Upvote
0
"As this is still an early tech announcement, though, to be more precise they were strictly hands-off photos, as I wasn't allowed to actually touch the camera, turn it on, open any of the ports or compartments, or see the bottom of it." Unfortunately nothing new learned here.In the mean time...
Anyone seen this..
Canon EOS R3 Review | Photography Blog
Expert review of the Canon EOS R3 full-frame mirrorless camera with full-size sample photos.
Upvote
0
Gordon at Cameralabs did a video in the Sam situation.In the mean time...
Anyone seen this..
Canon EOS R3 Review | Photography Blog
Expert review of the Canon EOS R3 full-frame mirrorless camera with full-size sample photos.
Upvote
0
That sticker warning of the back of the camera becoming too hot to touch thoughIn the mean time...
Anyone seen this..
Canon EOS R3 Review | Photography Blog
Expert review of the Canon EOS R3 full-frame mirrorless camera with full-size sample photos.
I would have thought they could maybe used the bigger body to distribute the heat evenly enough. But if their solution to overheating actually is just the heat sink one we've seen some third parties perform, I don't see why they can't also offer an upgrade service for the R5. Of course, a tear down of the R3 will be very interesting to see what they actually did to mitigate heat, and why it seems to be concentrated in the back of the camera.
Upvote
0
Sorry!! Mea culpa! I thought it might be sarcasm, but as well as full of Sheldons it is also full of people that actually believe that kind of thing
Your use of sarcasm is certainly top notch, got us all fooled
Upvote
0
well, back in those days those ISO levels were not considered rubbish, just like film before it wasn't considered rubbish. It's only "rubbish" by modern standards and even then; without those cameras, the cameras we have now would never have existed.
Users tend to be more rubbish than their gear and the better cameras get, the more obvious this is.
Upvote
0
Oh absolutely, and back in the day it was as good as it gets for sure. Frustrating at times but the bar was set way lower.
I liked them so much I still have them even if just as paperweights in the office.
"Users tend to be more rubbish than their gear and the better cameras get, the more obvious this is."
To that I partially agree though.
I agree that most of the users will never squeeze 100% of the capabilities of the camera, mainly because we usually niche ourselves into genres that tend to disregard some of the technologies cameras have these days (what does a landscaper care about extreme AF speed or a birder about focus stacking for example). But I think with cameras getting better and better and the inevitable intrusion of AI, it can make up for some lack of skills in certain areas.
Also, and this is slightly off topic, as much as (I assume) we all here may have some level of critical thinking when it comes to viewing images, the vast majority of the public loves a highly saturated, over-sharpened, orange and teal "moody" edit. So it gets hard to measure "rubbishness" since clearly unskilled photographers are killing it as "content creators" while real hardcore professionals are grinding 12 h shifts and struggling to get published, and in many cases, using the same gear. So if success is a metric for rubbish, we are utterly effed. . .
Upvote
0
I’m curious what are the biggest Canon announcements in recent years (RF era) that weren’t rumored here first?
Upvote
0
Does it? Looks like somebody just summarizing the vague info we already got in the previous development announcements in video form. Also, the text boxes and audio seem very basic, not particularly professional. I guess it isn't official marketing material.
In any case, nothing new in it.
Upvote
0
I do like the full flippy tilting screens in the way Canon implement them, even though I’m mainly a stills shooter. However I do hope that Canon have taken into account the fact that I will eventually accidentally snap it off, and that they have taken this into account when designing the electronics, so that the rest of the camera will keep working for me, sans the rear screen.
Upvote
0
For the conspiracy theorist of the world. The rumored R3 with 30ish MP really was going to be the R1. Every thing was set in in silicon months or even years ago. The Sony announced the A1 doing 30 FPS with 50 MP. Canon couldn't change the hardware in time so Canon marketing said lets call it the R3 and price it a lower and buy time to come out with an R1 with higher specs than Sony A1. 
.
.
Upvote
0
Ever consider the text the boxes being covered was originally Korean? It's clearly a bad translation added in post with a text box.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
