Is September 14 the day we finally get the official Canon EOS R3 announcement?

Well, rick1, we certainly can see, unlike PBD, your name will not be at the top of the R3 acquisition list. No drooling going on here. Maybe one future day, not too distant hopefully, Canon can come out with a camera that will meet your expectations, hopefully before Sony crushes them. I guess it's just doom and gloom for Canon. Somebody should tell them. Having such strong feelings about it, perhaps, you could share your forecast with them, as they may be unaware of the imminent peril the most inadequate R3 has placed them in.
I'm preordering the R3 when it's released. It is going to replace my sony a9ii. I am only buying it because money is not a concern currently. If money was a concern it would be a hard pass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I'm preordering the R3 when it's released. It is going to replace my sony a9ii. I am only buying it because money is not a concern currently. If money was a concern it would be a hard pass.
Well, after your neg commentary about the R3, I'm surprised you're getting it but do hope it works for you. As to money being of no current concern, of course, we don't yet know the price, guesses of which are all over the board. To most of the rest of us out here, money, at some level is usually a concern.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
ILC is not only the professional market, it is the consumer market also. Canon has lost huge ground in the professional market in the past few years. I know dozens of canon wedding photographers that have dumped canon for sony.
Wow, you know a few people. Good for you. News flash: anecdotes ≠ data. 55% of the press cameras used at the recent Tokyo Olympics were Canon. Those are data. Can you see the difference? Oh, I know…sporting events aren’t weddings. Fine, share the data on wedding photographers. Except we both know you have no such data.

So all you can say is that Canon has lost huge ground in the minuscule market niche that comprises the handful of professionals you know. Your personal experience differs from the available data.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
And yet, in my understanding, if distance to subject is increased, so is DOF...
I do not understand why cropping a picture should reduce DOF ???
Cropping per se doesn't reduce the dof. But then enlarging the smaller sensor area to the same output size does reduce dof. Take a look at this thread.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
ILC is not only the professional market, it is the consumer market also. Canon has lost huge ground in the professional market in the past few years. I know dozens of canon wedding photographers that have dumped canon for sony. I did and then I partially switched back with the R5. The R3 is not going to convince me to make the full switch back that's for sure.
But do Canon or Sony care if the A1 or R5 is sold to an amateur or professional? A sale is a sale and Canon rules the sales with over twice the volume as Sony and over 30% more increase in market share than Sony.
 
Upvote 0
I am confused. You are saying that with the same specs, but with R1 label, the camera would be worth buying?
Don't feel bad. You are not confused. If the camera isn't labeled "Super Charged" somewhere, I'm not buying either. Damn the performance. Also, the camera must address me as "Stallion" at startup.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
I meant canon has gained ground with it's low level consumer cameras. Sony prosumer mirrorless has largely devastated canon in the past few years
Low level consumer camera sales have been falling for quite some time, across all manufacturers. Yet Canon has gained overall. But if facts aren’t enough to overcome your opinions, it’s unlikely deductive reasoning will be able to do so.
 
Upvote 0
Low level consumer camera sales have been falling for quite some time, across all manufacturers. Yet Canon has gained overall. But if facts aren’t enough to overcome your opinions, it’s unlikely deductive reasoning will be able to do so.
I am not refuting that canon has gained ground in low level consumer cameras. I just said the area where canon has been killed by sony (pre-R5) is prosumer mirrorless
 
Upvote 0
I just said the area where canon has been killed by sony (pre-R5) is prosumer mirrorless
Yes. Among the handful of people you know. You’re assuming those you know are somehow representative of a broader group, with no evidence to support that assumption.

I know several advanced enthusiast and pro photographers who shoot FF and have recently switched from Sony to Canon, and one who switched from Nikon to Sony. But I am not concluding that Canon is killing Sony in the prosumer mirrorless arena, because I understand the difference between anecdotes and data, an understanding that you apparently lack.
 
Upvote 0
Yes. Among the handful of people you know. You’re assuming those you know are somehow representative of a broader group, with no evidence to support that assumption.

I know several advanced enthusiast and pro photographers who shoot FF and have recently switched from Sony to Canon, and one who switched from Nikon to Sony. But I am not concluding that Canon is killing Sony in the prosumer mirrorless arena, because I understand the difference between anecdotes and data, an understanding that you apparently lack.
When you see famous people on IG switching to sony from canon, peers in your industry, when you read articles about people switching to mirrorless, and then when you yourself switch, it is very easy to deduce what is going on. It is widely known that people have been dropping nikon and canon for sony mirrorless when sony had the only mirrorless offering in the market. If you don't see that then you're living under a rock
 
Upvote 0
Yes, if that was the R1, I might consider it, but I do not want to spend 6000 Euros on a camera that is marketed as non flagship. It feels like spending $999 or so on the non pro iPhone. Of course calling a phone "Pro" is ridiculous anyway.

I don't like that Canon has switched to suggesting that a low resolution sensor is somehow inferior. We saw that with the R5 and R6.
I agree with that sentiment. Crisp class deep Canon every time. Because you can navigate to hold it properly. Beauty.
 
Upvote 0
When you see famous people on IG switching to sony from canon, peers in your industry, when you read articles about people switching to mirrorless, and then when you yourself switch, it is very easy to deduce what is going on. It is widely known that people have been dropping nikon and canon for sony mirrorless when sony had the only mirrorless offering in the market. If you don't see that then you're living under a rock
Sony (and other manufacturers) routinely compensate influencers to publicly switch. Sure, Sony had FF mirrorless for 5 years longer than Canon. So anyone who wanted a FF MILC went Sony. That has changed. As I stated, 55% of the press at the Olympics used Canon. That’s higher than Canon’s 48% share of the ILC market as a whole.

Bringing personal anecdotes and your own opinion to an objective discussion rarely ends well. If you want to claim you think Sony makes the bestest cameras ever, that’s fine. If you want to claim that Sony is crushing Canon in the prosumer camera market, bring some data.
 
Upvote 0