Nikon announces the Z6III

Nikon marketing says 'partially' stacking the sensor is a lot cheaper than 'fully' stacking it.

But don't let that distract from the fact that it's 24MP, which is, according to newly registered accounts here, completely unsuited for photography!
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Nikon was lacking a solid midfielder, especially a machine with top tier AF system. I would recommend old Nikon F folks upgrade to this or Z8. Just like Canon EF folks upgrade to R6/R6ii or R5/R5ii(soon™)

There's little reasons to get Sony E mount system nowadays.
 
Upvote 0
Nikon marketing says 'partially' stacking the sensor is a lot cheaper than 'fully' stacking it.

But don't let that distract from the fact that it's 24MP, which is, according to newly registered accounts here, completely unsuited for photography!

it's such a weird term. Dual-Sided Stacked Sensor™ would have been my guess. but then again, I'm not Nikon.

and clearly 24MP is so low resolution that even casual photographers would spurn it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Nikon was lacking a solid midfielder, especially a machine with top tier AF system. I would recommend old Nikon F folks upgrade to this or Z8. Just like Canon EF folks upgrade to R6/R6ii or R5/R5ii(soon™)

There's little reasons to get Sony E mount system nowadays.

Yeah I see this camera as a shot across the bow of Sony.

Sony Camera division is phoning up the fab today....

ezgif-6-272725c152.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Then R6 mkiii has more chance to get R3 sensor now!
You might be right. According to Nikon (on Petapixel): “Nikon says the “mid-range” market — think Canon EOS R6 Mark II, Sony a7 IV, and the Fujifilm X-T5 — is booming and comprises nearly 60% of all revenue in the interchangeable lens camera space and an even greater percentage of cameras on a per-unit basis.”
If 60% of revenue is a correct number, this may be the reason why the R6 Mk II was released quite soon after the R6 and it might be a reason to put a stacked 24MP sensor in the successor of the R6 Mk II.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I am curious of what is really going on there regarding the \"semi-stacked sensor\". One thing I noticed is that in Nikon\'s official texts there is no mention of BSI (at least not that I could find), so I am now wondering if this is something similar that Canon has been doing with the R5 and R6ii sensors to get them quite fast.

This Z6iii sensor is still twice as fast as the R6ii\'s though, as it allows a similar RS but while using 14 bit readout (vs 12 bit on the R6ii), so it\'s quite impressive. It makes me more optimistic about an R6iii with R3\'s sensor.
 
Upvote 0
Nothing to do with the Z6III, but I've recently noticed that both Canon and Nikon USA's press releases both have "Melville, NY" as their respective locations. Turns out their USA HQs are less than a mile away from each other.

1718646221787.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
I am curious of what is really going on there regarding the \"semi-stacked sensor\". One thing I noticed is that in Nikon\'s official texts there is no mention of BSI (at least not that I could find), so I am now wondering if this is something similar that Canon has been doing with the R5 and R6ii sensors to get them quite fast.

This Z6iii sensor is still twice as fast as the R6ii\'s though, as it allows a similar RS but while using 14 bit readout (vs 12 bit on the R6ii), so it\'s quite impressive. It makes me more optimistic about an R6iii with R3\'s sensor.

no, nothing similar according to the press release.

dpreview talks a little about it, seems they built up on top of the sensor around the outside.

I don't see the benefit it's not closer to the pixels, and it's still a 1/60th refresh rate in 14 bit mode. so it's not as if it's Z 9 speeds which was 1/270th.

I guess there is cost associated with a stacked sensor - but it's a 2500 camera body.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Nothing to do with the Z6III, but I've recently noticed that both Canon and Nikon USA's press releases both have "Melville, NY" as their respective locations. Turns out their USA HQs are less than a mile away from each other.

View attachment 217530

sniper distances. things got real between those two. there is a history ;)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Nikon was lacking a solid midfielder, especially a machine with top tier AF system. I would recommend old Nikon F folks upgrade to this or Z8. Just like Canon EF folks upgrade to R6/R6ii or R5/R5ii(soon™)

There's little reasons to get Sony E mount system nowadays.
There has never been a reason to get a soni.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0