Post your HDR images:
- Thread starter blaydese
- Start date
I've been dabbling with HDR for some time, and stalking these forums without posting/registering for the past twelve months. Here are a couple more recent HDR photos I've done-- nothing special.
HDR Campfire
Govan Schoolhouse HDR (East/Central WA state)
Spokane Riverfront Park HDR (Monochrome)
HDR Campfire
Govan Schoolhouse HDR (East/Central WA state)
Spokane Riverfront Park HDR (Monochrome)
Upvote
0
Click said:
Yes, very nice photo! I would love to go there someday and try to capture a shot like that.
Upvote
0
Hey guys, first time poster here, I think; I don't recall posting on the forum in the past...
Anyway, I've enjoyed a lot of the work posted in this thread, so here's a few of mine. I have fun with the HDR development process on some of my stuff, but on a lot of it I prefer an invisible HDR; that generally means either manually merging several brackets or just treading very lightly with the tone-mapping part of HDR. I've got some of both below....
Anyway, I've enjoyed a lot of the work posted in this thread, so here's a few of mine. I have fun with the HDR development process on some of my stuff, but on a lot of it I prefer an invisible HDR; that generally means either manually merging several brackets or just treading very lightly with the tone-mapping part of HDR. I've got some of both below....
Attachments
Upvote
0
mpetersheim said:
Gorgeous photos. The last 3 look so natural I wouldn't have guessed they were HDR. What software did you use?
Upvote
0
serendipidy said:
Thanks! All but the third photo had initial processing done in HDR Efex Pro 2; the third one was just done manually in Photoshop, as I recall. With the last photo, I merged portions of the original photos back in over some of the less natural HDR sections.
Upvote
0
rpt said:Wow! Such great pics. The in camera HDR is terrible! I must get one of the HDR plugins. Suggestions please
I think the two most popular ones are Photomatix and Nik Software's HDR Efex Pro. Photomatix is cheaper (now that all Nik plugins are bundled together), probably more powerful and with a steeper learning curve. HDR Efex Pro costs more because all the Nik plugins are bundled together since Google bought Nik, and I think it's a little easier to learn but doesn't give you the level of control that Photomatix does. If others disagree, please correct me; it's been awhile since I used Photomatix.
The upside of buying the Nik bundle is that you get five other plugins, too; Silver Efex Pro, Viveza and Color Efex Pro were all particularly useful additions for me.
Really, though, I don't think you can go wrong with either option for HDR processing.
Upvote
0
mpetersheim, thanks. I will check them out.mpetersheim said:rpt said:Wow! Such great pics. The in camera HDR is terrible! I must get one of the HDR plugins. Suggestions please
I think the two most popular ones are Photomatix and Nik Software's HDR Efex Pro. Photomatix is cheaper (now that all Nik plugins are bundled together), probably more powerful and with a steeper learning curve. HDR Efex Pro costs more because all the Nik plugins are bundled together since Google bought Nik, and I think it's a little easier to learn but doesn't give you the level of control that Photomatix does. If others disagree, please correct me; it's been awhile since I used Photomatix.
The upside of buying the Nik bundle is that you get five other plugins, too; Silver Efex Pro, Viveza and Color Efex Pro were all particularly useful additions for me.
Really, though, I don't think you can go wrong with either option for HDR processing.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
