LOALTD said:"The Zeiss resolves strongly throughout the frame, and that resolution is further boosted by a quality that I rarely see equalled by non-Zeiss lenses, and that is microcontrast. When I use that term I refer not only to the global contrast of any particular image but also to the unique quality of strong contrast in the fine details. It aids the appearance of resolution because images do not have any of the “haze” that makes them appear softer. This really helps images from Zeiss lenses like this one have a nice three dimensional quality. Head to head comparisons consistently show that Zeiss lenses have better contrast than just about any of their competitors (including the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8), which simply means that details resolve more crisply."
Can we see some of these head to head comparisons?
I've heard many people throw around the term "micro contrast", but I've never seen anyone back it up with actual examples.
Matt Granger does just that with the Zeiss 15 vs. the Nikon 14-24mm here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toqo-_q2WPg&spfreload=10
I compare the microcontrast with the Zeiss Sonnar T* 2/135mm vs. the Canon 135L (the results are amazing, by the way.): http://dustinabbott.net/2014/07/zeiss-apo-sonnar-t-2135mm-ze-review-2/
Upvote
0