Off Topic (but please read to the end):
My R5MkII order was placed on the morning of its official announcement; August 20 is the promised shipping date. I've purchased an EF lens adapter, the requisite CF card, as well as 15-30 and 200-800 RF lenses (the latter remains back-ordered).
A goal is to buy RF lenses that I will actually use (unlike, say, the EF 70-200 f4 IS lens, which seldom gets attached to any camera I own).
For a 'travel' walk-around lens I'm strongly considering the RF 24-240 lens; I think it would be good enough for what I want it to do.
But I'm currently on vacation (holiday to the Euros reading this!), and am having quite a bit of fun using an
M6MkII mated to the EF-M 18-150 (eq 29-240).
There's a Pacific Coast sunset
hereusing this combination...
...and the same combination was used for this crow.
View attachment 218593
The M6MkII is reasonably powerful and oh-so-easy to travel with (small volume and mass) and, for my needs, supplies results that are 'good enough'.
I am sort of envious of those who post here on CR who, even on holiday, seem to travel with their best gear; images they post here prove that their efforts are worthwhile.
But traveling light is of tremendous import to me (and my wife

)...and I wonder about walking around 'town' with the R5MkII/24-240 vs the M6MkII/18-150 (eq 29-240) package that generated the images above.
In fact, to many security-types at some venues, the M6MkII/18-150 combo doesn't even look like a real camera (which is a good thing!).
It's all fun...