We keep hearing about the Canon EOS R6 Mark III coming in 2024

If only it got a top LCD, I would use it as a second body, along my future R5 II. I'd hate having to look thru the EVF or at the rear LCD in order to check my main settings. It's so much easier from above.
Your preferences are legitimate of course but you might be surprised how little you miss it - I was. You have to look at either the screen or EVF to compose a shot anyhow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
The Nikon Z6 III has surpassed the EOS R6 Mark II in a lot of areas, especially in video capabilities. It sports 12bit internal video recording, versus 10bit, significantly higher frame-rates in both 4K and 1080p. Both cameras will shoot RAW video, but the Nikon can do it internally. The EVF is also significantly better in the Z6 III.
Is this Nikon rumors or what about all the raving about the Z6III? That camera has less dynamic range than the original EOS R from 2018 and it's autofocus is almost on the same level. Talking about DR:

That's just one test on the internet that most of us probably wouldn't notice in the real world photography wise, perhaps the video people would notice the dynamic range differences?
4K is also not a lot different from HD movies, 45 megapixels is not a lot different from 24MP. Most people wouldn't notice the difference when printed or displayed on social media. Yet it is a difference. Maybe if you don't edit your pictures, but from my personal experience I can say, YES you notice a stop less DR if you lift shadows. The subpar DR is probably Nikon/Sonys way of cheating their sensors to a faster readout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
I´ve posted several times on this forum that I believe a R6mkiii is very close (most people just smiled/ laughed at me), so it wouldn't be a surprise for me at all. R6/ Z6/ A7 line sells in volumes and there are a lot of "entry-kind-of-people" who do compare a lot before they enter a camera system/ brand, so keeping that line up to date is essential.
When Nikon announced the Z6 III they said on Petapixel: “Nikon says the “mid-range” market — think Canon EOS R6 Mark II, Sony a7 IV, and the Fujifilm X-T5 — is booming and comprises nearly 60% of all revenue in the interchangeable lens camera space and an even greater percentage of cameras on a per-unit basis.”
If 60% of revenue is a correct number, this means it is important for manufacturers to be competitive in this part of the market and be the reason that why the release cycle of the R6 models is two years. It might also be a reason to put a version of the R3’s stacked 24MP sensor in the successor of the R6 Mk II.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Upvote 1
Is Canon having the cashback promotions in your area right now? If so, have a look if that brings the price in line with your GAS threshold :)
Yeah, they do. New its $4k. The last refurb sale was I think $3500. Paletable if I sell my R6 to offset. But I figure the sales will return or remain after the R1 and R5II are announced.
Your preferences are legitimate of course but you might be surprised how little you miss it - I was. You have to look at either the screen or EVF to compose a shot anyhow.
Case in point that this is a personal thing. I got an R6 a year after launch, and then an R5 just a few months ago. I actually would prefer the R5 had the top dial and no screen like the R6. Faster to change modes. All necessary data on the mini LCD is in the evf or on the back screen anyway.
Curious that Canon is getting left behind in megapixels, with only one camera (R5) above "24", after being the main protagonist in the early days.
People using the cameras generally don't care as much about MP as people talking about cameras on the internet. Agencies especially are using the photos for online posting, and they are significantly downsampled/downsized anyway. MP is a niche market, perhaps amplified here on the forums. Heck, even most of us here just post to IG or FB, and watch our 60mp mosaics reduced to 8mp anyway.
Brian
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Curious that Canon is getting left behind in megapixels, with only one camera (R5) above "24", after being the main protagonist in the early days.
It's almost as if Canon's new in-house manufacturing equipment is restricted to 24MP. Only one full-frame full res outlier in the entire lineup. Everything else 24MP -- at least one for every conceivable niche in the full frame market. But if you can only dominate a single part of the market, it seems that 24MP is a pretty good place to be.
 
Upvote 0
There were times when I would be shooting my main portraits for the day with the R5 while my assistant used an R6. Despite using the same lighting and poses, the tones from my R5 shots were often challenging to edit, whereas the R6 tones looked flawless and required no editing. The only difference was the lenses—either 50 to 85 or 85 to 50—not enough to cause a significant disparity. We spent copious amounts of time trying to salvage photos from the R5, while the R6 shots were effortlessly perfect. Then the R3 came into our lives and changed the game. I could shoot an entire wedding in JPEG on auto white balance and walk away happy with minimal tweaks. Editing the R3 files in Lightroom is effortless and consistent.
If you’re using Adobe profiles with RAW files in LR for the R5, you’ll get bad colours. But that’s more of an Adobe problem than an R5 problem.

I’m a massive fan of the ColorFidelity profiles, they get the colours very close to what DPP4 gives you. It’s highly subjective of course.
 
Upvote 0
> We have stopped rating posts with the [CR] system

Glad to hear it: sometimes site-specific terminology can be just a barrier to understanding for people whose lives don't revolve around a given forum, especially for those losing whatever mental edge we had in our youth :-D . I log in here most weeks since before the R and I still could never remember what meant what!
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Your preferences are legitimate of course but you might be surprised how little you miss it - I was. You have to look at either the screen or EVF to compose a shot anyhow.
I've tested the R6 when it came, and couldn't get used to it, due to it lacking the top LCD.
When hiking, camera setting is always on "M", I often check aperture , ISO and shutter speed via the top LCD. (And often readjust the settings depending on ambient light).
Yes, I know, I could use Av or Tv, or auto ISO. But don't want to!
It's a feature I'd really miss, and I will never buy a camera without it! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I've tested the R6 when it came, and couldn't get used to it, due to it lacking the top LCD.
When hiking, camera setting is always on "M", I often check aperture , ISO and shutter speed via the top LCD. (And often readjust the settings depending on ambient light).
Yes, I know, I could use Av or Tv, or auto ISO. But don't want to!
It's a feature I'd really miss, and I will never buy a camera without it! :)
I only ever use M. I also "hike" with it. But I switch it off most of the time because I want to save battery life, so a top LCD would be blank anyway :LOL:
 
Upvote 0
A stacked sensor would be amazing in a 6-series camera. My R6 is pretty quiet in mechanical already but silent shooting without banding would be the cherry on top for theatre photography.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0