We have seen some articles online regarding the possibility of an EOS R8 V, which would be a full-frame brother to the EOS R50 V.
Read the Full Article
Read the Full Article
I would not take this rumor seriously: The source is the New Camera, a site that consciously publishes incorrect data and does not correct it when their errors are brought to their attention.Cautiously excited about this one...The Canon R50V has become my go-to recommendation for content creators who ask what camera they should buy. I actually get asked this several times a month covering events. In fact, I bought one myself and I’ve been genuinely impressed by how well it’s built and how it performs. Especially at this price point, it just makes sense for YouTubers, vloggers, and influencers on a budget. The rolling shutter is...well, not great, but perfectly fine for tripod use. It didn't do very well as a gimbal real estate camera because of this, sadly.
While I haven’t personally needed a dedicated camera for this type of work, I can easily see the R50V being a great choice for a top-down rig or as a second/third angle. That said, I still wish Canon would add C-Log3 to the R10, which I also own.
If Canon releases an R8V, I’d love to see C-Log2 included and not just C-Log3. The hype around that format is definitely justified for my workflow. I sold my C70 with the hope that the R1 would replace it and, for me, it absolutely has. My only remaining frustration is with the obvious lack of internal ND filters. Every variable ND I’ve tried still comes with trade-offs. But (and I may catch some heat for saying this)… the R1 and R5 Mark II have both proven to be better video cameras for me than the C70 ever was. The C70 image is incredibly soft and never matched well with my previous B camera, the R3. The footage also doesn't do very well with punching in for tighter crops. When shooting side-by-side with the R3, the C70 almost looked out of focus because the 4K image is that soft compared to the downsampled 6K on the R3 and now the R1.
Sorry this was so wordy! haha
Has ibis, higher iso, but low res stills, no mechanical shutter, no cooling fan, worse lcd screen...they all have advantages and drawbacks.It\'s hard to compete with ZV-E1 if there\'s no clog2... Maybe time for clog4?
I would be thrilled with an EVF attachment too. I still can't 100% commit to just having a back screen for photography and even videography to some extent.Very intriguing! Make it small, make it good, give me an attachable EVF, and I'm in!![]()
Well where's the fun in that!I would not take this rumor seriously: The source is the New Camera, a site that consciously publishes incorrect data and does not correct it when their errors are brought to their attention.
The attachable EVF ala M6II, etc. is a surprising thing missing so far. I guess it makes sense if the purpose is video-centric. But I was really surprised that they didn’t introduce one as an optional accessory when the R50V was rolled out.Very intriguing! Make it small, make it good, give me an attachable EVF, and I'm in!![]()
Why shoot so low.It\'s hard to compete with ZV-E1 if there\'s no clog2... Maybe time for clog4?
I have one for the M6II and haven't used it in years, but on the R50V I keep eyeing the RF100-400 and RF100L and wanting an EVF. For the STM primes I don't want or need one, but for macro and tele-zooms, it does have a place.I would be thrilled with an EVF attachment too. I still can't 100% commit to just having a back screen for photography and even videography to some extent.
It's essential for the telezooms unless you are using a tripod.I have one for the M6II and haven't used it in years, but on the R50V I keep eyeing the RF100-400 and RF100L and wanting an EVF. For the STM primes I don't want or need one, but for macro and tele-zooms, it does have a place.
I'd like IBIS as well, but not at the expense of making the camera a lot thicker.I would be delighted to upgrade my R8 to the next version. My only request is IBIS. Without IBIS, I have no reason to upgrade it...