Sort of. It doesn't have a purely mechanical shutter in the conventional sense, in which the shutter is opened and closed mechanically. In the R8, the choice is between EFCS and ES.The R8 has a mechanical shutter
Upvote
0
Sort of. It doesn't have a purely mechanical shutter in the conventional sense, in which the shutter is opened and closed mechanically. In the R8, the choice is between EFCS and ES.The R8 has a mechanical shutter
The existence of the R10 was what fueled my biggest doubts that Canon would actually come out with something like the R50. The market will sort it out, but it seems to me like only a tiny sliver of the camera-buying public would find the R10 worth the extra $200+.Looks like not much different between R10 and R50. For the $200 price difference, I would say R50 wins. See link for Canon's own comparison between the two.
Canon R10 vs R50
Yes, a couple of excellent new options, expanding the Canon range to offer something for almost everyone, at all price points.In my opinion, Canon hit these out of the park. These look like great cameras at their price points.
Is there room for an R9 in the lineup at this point? I can't really see it happening.
Canon really does not have any full-frame mirrorless camera that competes directly against the Z 5.Still no camera for stills shooters (pun intended). But good work from product management. Some features worse than the competition, some better. Not bad enough to make you switch systems; but not good enough to make you happy neither.
View attachment 207495
Edit: both prices are what I would pay in Germany today.
Battery life according to DPR.
When I recall my physics lesson right, indoors without wind compensation needed it was about 46 to 47° angle.The stupidly strong ejection spring did provide enough force to fling a Zip disk across the room, distracting you from getting actual work done while trying to find the optimum launch angle.
Some will, but camera models do not solely exist to get people to upgrade.Would still shooters who already own the RP really upgrade to the R8?
I'm sure there will be some people like you who can appreciate those differences. But the vast majority of those who are drawn to the low end of the market are going to be looking at capabilities, results (and how easy it is to get them) and (somewhat) availability of lenses, and the lowest cost way to get them. They will assume that the manufacturer has provided a reasonable way to access the features they'll most commonly need, and live with whatever limitations those controls have if and when they start using the camera in a more sophisticated fashion.I personally disagree, on the R10 the second dial on top and the joystick (and, at least for me, also the lock button) are worth the 200$ difference, and even more.
The R8 is disappointing to me in design despite having really nice specs, I owned the RP for a while and the body just isn’t very ergonomic, I feel like it’s lazy for canon to just reuse the parts and leave out things like a control wheel or joystick (which even the cheaper R10 has).
The R8 has much faster rolling shutter so the electronic shutter FPS is more useful than the R7.In Germany, the R sells for 1.299 € or 1.399 €. The R8 is priced at 1.799 €... I'd choose the R everyday over the R8 offering because the R8 is only better in the AF performance and FPS. If you absolutely need great AF and FPS, I guess the R7 is the best offering despite being APS-C.
I believe those would work fine with the $40 USD adapterHave a look at the R50 hotshoe! If you plan on ever using a strobist or studio flash with the R50, you'd better get a different camera.
I think people rightfully come here to see new, inspiring things from Canon for their craft, not just things that barely work for more money than before.Then get the Panasonic, if you want to spend the extra, it's an excellent camera. Or save yourself $400 and get the R8, which is effectively a mini R6ii with a slightly lower spec and shorter battery life. Sometimes I think you just come here to search for something to groan about...
The question is; why? I remember a guy who was forced to use such an adapter on the old, proprietary Sony hotshoe, and it stopped working in the middle of an expensive studio session. So really the question is: why?I believe those would work fine with the $40 USD adapter
Possibly, if you have the necessary skill, but have you given any consideration to the fact that the R50 just might not be aimed at you personally?Can probably do more with my Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra + M6 mk 2 than that R50 with it's huge EVF hump. Exactly who that camera is for is beyond me.
That was my first thought. These bodies look really rough.The R8 is disappointing to me in design despite having really nice specs, I owned the RP for a while and the body just isn’t very ergonomic, I feel like it’s lazy for canon to just reuse the parts and leave out things like a control wheel or joystick (which even the cheaper R10 has).
Yes, they should. As should all the 'old' Canon flashes, and by 'old' I mean every single currently available Speedlite, since only the EL-5 uses the new multifunction shoe natively and that's not even shipping until the end of March (I preordered one). That's pretty crappy to not make the R50's hotshoe backward-compatible, it would be a different story if there were a range of flashes available for the new shoe design.I believe those would work fine with the $40 USD adapter
Come on. You really think the R50 is aimed at people who use studio flashes?Have a look at the R50 hotshoe! If you plan on ever using a strobist or studio flash with the R50, you'd better get a different camera.