I did. The R50 sensor looks almost identical to the R10 unless I'm missing something. And I don't shoot video. Open to thoughts though.You picked it over the R10 ?
Upvote
0
I did. The R50 sensor looks almost identical to the R10 unless I'm missing something. And I don't shoot video. Open to thoughts though.You picked it over the R10 ?
I agree, the R50 and R10 are very close.Will the R10 survive?
I agree; my R10 handles practically the same of my R6.One thing I do find interesting is that the R8 didn't get the joystick but the R10 did. I use the joystick all the time on my 90D and have it set to change the AF points without pressing the AF button first.
By reading you, I guess you didn't like the "Touch and Drag AF" function of the M6 Mark II. To my sense it's as fast and efficient as a joystick, but to each his own, of course.I agree; my R10 handles practically the same of my R6.
When I had the M6II in place of the R10, moving AF point was a nightmare; I can survive without the joystick on a family/holiday camera, but not even on a backup camera to my main one.
I've never used a camera with a joystick for that purpose, but I use Touch & Drag AF on my M50 a lot. I think the factory setting is off. It was one of the first settings I changed when I got my camera.By reading you, I guess you didn't like the "Touch and Drag AF" function of the M6 Mark II. To my sense it's as fast and efficient as a joystick, but to each his own, of course.
I liked T&D on my RP as well, on the R5 the joystick is better positioned for that.By reading you, I guess you didn't like the "Touch and Drag AF" function of the M6 Mark II. To my sense it's as fast and efficient as a joystick, but to each his own, of course.
I used the touch screen to focus my R and it worked well. I’d do the same with the R8.I've never used a camera with a joystick for that purpose, but I use Touch & Drag AF on my M50 a lot. I think the factory setting is off. It was one of the first settings I changed when I got my camera.
I always found my nose intervening in T&D mode on the EOS R.I liked T&D on my RP as well, on the R5 the joystick is better positioned for that.
I didn’t, but I use my left eye and perhaps you use your right eye.I always found my nose intervening in T&D mode on the EOS R.
Then again, I've always happily used the multi-function bar (for zoom) where pretty much everyone else disables it - so I don't claim to be typicalI didn’t, but I use my left eye and perhaps you use your right eye.
Rp eats LP5 battery,The extension grip EG-E1 is listed as an accessory for the R8 on Canon's website. This is the same grip as the RP, and as far as I can tell, the holes on the bottom of the R8 are the same as on the bottom of the RP, and the bottom of the R8 looks to be the same shape as the bottom of the RP. I'd say the R8 is for all intents and purposes the RP successor.
I suspect that https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1525429-REG/vello_bg_c18_battery_grip_for.html will work on the R8. With the caveat that you need a cable to use the shutter button.Rp eats LP5 battery,
R8 eats some toy batteries, but if the battery grip is true, then … wow. I am allmost all in…
EF-S lenses like the 10-22 or 10-18 (or the many 3rd party options like the Token 11-16/2.8) can be easily adapted to the R50. Also, the R8 does not have IBIS, either.I want a handheld (or a camera on a gimbal) for vlogging. I so wanted to get the R50 but will go with the R8 mainly because R50 does not have a wide enough lens and second, it does not have IBIS.
R8 has IBIS in video.EF-S lenses like the 10-22 or 10-18 (or the many 3rd party options like the Token 11-16/2.8) can be easily adapted to the R50. Also, the R8 does not have IBIS, either.
I'm thinking that the R8 does not have IBISR50 + adaptor + 11-18mm = 375 + 110 + 240 = 725 gm
R8 + RF 24-50 = 460 + 210 = 670
So, I get a full-frame camera with IBIS and it weighs less than a crop setup. So the R8 seems like a better deal. Unless I am missing something.