I dunno. If you’re not pressing the release latch firmly enough, that sounds like a firmware problem.I am guessing that the firmware update won't help getting the flash shoe cap off!
I tried it once, about a year ago. Since the subject is supposed to be still, and I am a tried-and-true contrarian, I naturally used it to do a long exposure of a waterfall.In three months with the R5 I haven't even tested it yet.
I am guessing that the firmware update won't help getting the flash shoe cap off!
They really need to adress the mirror falling off problem that I read in a blog a year or so ago. I think that complaint caused the blogger to get a sony*.I am guessing that the firmware update won't help getting the flash shoe cap off!
Canon should be more specific. My understanding is that the upres feature is based on genAI using a local LLM. I could be wrong but it seems unlikely that a generic algorithm would be used even if deep learning AI was used.I love the common trend to throw in the term "AI" when they really mean it's a simple algorithm.
Literally all AI developed by humanity so far is algorithmic. Even the most powerful ChatGPT versions are just programs with a lot of data. The borderline between what is "AI" and what is not "AI" is a little bit fuzzy.I love the common trend to throw in the term "AI" when they really mean it's a simple algorithm. It's like "turbo" in the 80's. I think even my coffee machine had a "Turbo" in it's title inthe 80's....
Whatever they implemented in camera, it's not LLM. It's got nothing to do with the language. Also, it's definitely not very large.My understanding is that the upres feature is based on genAI using a local LLM.
To me it's not a gimmick.It doesn't have the IBIS multishot thing, during launch Canon said that using 'AI' to upres a JPEG in-camera is much better. While I thought the IBIS multishot was a gimmick, the AI upres thing is even more useless if I want more detail in a static scene.
Haha. I remember that.I love the common trend to throw in the term "AI" when they really mean it's a simple algorithm. It's like "turbo" in the 80's. I think even my coffee machine had a "Turbo" in its title inthe 80's....
Clearly we aren't entering prompts but there are localised image generation models that run on phones for instance. The AL processors in the R5ii should be powerful enough to run such a model. The question is whether it is a simple algorithm eg interpolation or actually attempts to create new detail.Whatever they implemented in camera, it's not LLM. It's got nothing to do with the language. Also, it's definitely not very large.
YES, PLEASE!4K 50/60 Downsampled from 8K![]()
Hahahaha. GreatI take the update - even without having the hardware ....
Totally agree. "AI" is an over-abused term these days.I love the common trend to throw in the term "AI" when they really mean it's a simple algorithm. It's like "turbo" in the 80's. I think even my coffee machine had a "Turbo" in it's title inthe 80's....
woah, what? 4 times it froze in such a short period of usage? Woah, that's intense!!! In a demanding environment, or during event documention with your client in the neck that's certainly a realy realy bad thing to happen. This would be way to much for me... that sounds like a heavy problem to me.I’ve noticed several issues with the R5II over the past few weeks, though nothing major, except for the camera freezing while shooting video, which has happened four times.
Hmm. I'm aware of the first option you mention, but even the smallest zone is significantly smaller than Spot AF. I am unable to replicate your second suggestion, however. A Canon Prof Services rep told me this was impossible. I'll PM you if you don't mind.You can do this. I use a small flexible zone with Eye Detection set to Auto and it will lock on the eye and only track the eye within the zone. Also, you can set the AF area to Spot AF and have Eye Detection set to Auto and it will detect the eye of a small bird at the AF Spot location and not track it throughout the entire frame.