This works for regular bursts as well! On 'temperamental' cameras like the R7, it's really easy to delete the whole out-of-focus 30fps burst in one go.
Upvote
0
Canon EOS R5 Mark II unconfirmed specifications
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
That's one reason I really miss Apple Aperture, which I used to triage RAW files prior to Apple killing it.
Based on the time stamps, Aperture would automatically put bursts into a stack, making it very easy to either go through the stack and pick the best one, or just delete the whole stack as a unit.
Upvote
0
I recently discovered 'stack by capture time' in Lightroom, scroll to the bottom of https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/help/grouping-photos-stacks.html. This was really helpful when I decided to import the original CR3 for all the DPP4 generated TIFFs, the auto stacking did an excellent job in stacking the TIFF + CR3.That's one reason I really miss Apple Aperture, which I used to triage RAW files prior to Apple killing it.
Nowadays I use the 'stack by capture time' to do what you describe: group a burst so I can collapse them to have better oversight and then pick the best shot from each burst. I wouldn't mind some algorithmic/AI/ML assist that pre-selects the best shots based on sharpness and composition.
Upvote
0
I tried it. Big lightroom fan, but not the auto-stacking thing. I will often be firing syncopated bursts, and lightroom gets confused. It's caused me to delete the wrong photos before, so I stay away. If your bursts are 1/2 second apart, I'd avoid it, or at least be super-careful when culling.
Upvote
0
On their own, they all seem like somewhat reasonable wishes, but add them all together and it just goes way over the top of what R5C successor might be - if we ever see one, and that's a big IF.
I don't see Canon adding ANY of the audio related features you listed to a compact form camera. There might be external separate devices, yes, but in a package? No.
I also don't see them adding ProRes or Arri RAW options. Even Canon raw is doubtful.
16 bit photos on a video-oriented camera... Doesn't make much sense.
Full sized HDMI is a reasonable thing, since it involves very little changes to the body and the internals. That is something that is likely to come, perhaps even on the R52. I have no idea why they went with micro hdmi, I hate those.
Clog2 - maybe, depending on the sensor.
I see IBIS as somewhat reasonable request, since Canon does have it, but it would require serious upgrading considering the wobbly / jerky results on R5.
Finally, the internal ND, while something I frequently miss from my big Sony cameras, is probably the most unlikely feature on your list. The ND mechanism would create a huge bulge on the camera and would very likely require extensive redesign of the body. You can't just cram it into an R5C form factor as there's simply no room for it. Not to mention IBIS + internal ND...
Upvote
0
All in all, what you are trying to say is that, - as part of the R5C upgrade, what Canon can reasonably offer is only a ‘Full Sized HDMI port’. That’s it! 
This leaves every Canon user who bought the R5C out in the cold ( & that's a $4299 camera. Not cheap. ) Thanks, Canon.
& Thanks for being honest, though.
Cheers.
https://petapixel.com/2024/06/05/th...nasonics-best-video-features-into-one-camera/
This leaves every Canon user who bought the R5C out in the cold ( & that's a $4299 camera. Not cheap. ) Thanks, Canon.
& Thanks for being honest, though.
Cheers.
https://petapixel.com/2024/06/05/th...nasonics-best-video-features-into-one-camera/
Attachments
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Is it full frame?All in all, what you are trying to say is that, - as part of the R5C upgrade, what Canon can reasonably offer is only a ‘Full Sized HDMI port’. That’s it!
This leaves every Canon user who bought the R5C out in the cold ( & that's a $4299 camera. Not cheap. ) Thanks, Canon.
& Thanks for being honest, though.
Cheers.
https://petapixel.com/2024/06/05/th...nasonics-best-video-features-into-one-camera/
Upvote
0
No you haven’t missed it: “We know that the flagship Canon EOS R5 has a 45MP CMOS sensor, up to 20fps silent shooting with the electronic shutter and 8K RAW video recording”.
Source: https://www.canon-europe.com/pro/stories/eos-r-features-never-knew-existed/
Edit: Raw light was added to the R5 with firmware update 1.3.0.
Source: https://www.usa.canon.com/support/c...firmware-notice-eos-r5-firmware-version-1-3-0
The raw formats explained : https://www.canon-europe.com/pro/stories/cinema-raw-light/
Last edited:
Upvote
0
As I understand it, there’s ‘raw’ and ‘raw light’ video, the R5 non-C gained the light one after a firmware update. Then there is ‘Cinema raw’ and ‘Cinema raw light’, the R5C supports ‘cinema raw light’.
I don’t know what the difference between the cinema and non-cinema raw formats is, but Canon marketing really likes talking about the cinema version.
Upvote
0
Why? Did the R5C not provide the people who bought it with what it promised? Does it stop working now?
Upvote
0
It won't be 16 stops in video.
That is what the C70 and C400 get.
It is more than the C500 II.
16 stops would be for photos with the mechanical shutter.
Read-out speed will be a nonissue other than FPS needing to be slower.
Upvote
0
Canon RAW started on cinema cameras as well.
The main difference is that Cinema RAW Light has greater compression.
The newest is Cinema RAW Light LT which has the most.
Upvote
0
I use it every day and it works perfectly.
It is neither useless nor a gimmick.
There are plenty of things that do not work for me personally but I do not assume that means they do not work for anyone in the world.
Do you think those of us who rave about it are just lying?
Upvote
0
The BURANO is a bit of a disaster.
It fills every spec but not very well.
Early consensus is that the C400 is a better camera at 1/4 the price.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
