Canon RF 70-150mm f/2.8 IS STM Coming To Complete the Trilogy?

It'll be interesting to see how much this cannibalizes the 70-200 f/4.

Losing the 50mm on the long end here is likely a smaller sacrifice for most users than losing the 4mm on the wide end of the 24-105 f/4 vs the 28-70.

With modern bodies, cropping in from 150-200 in exchange for an extra stop is likely a sound decision for most users. Unless the STM is markedly slower than the AF in the 70-200 f/4 I think it'd be hard to recommend the f/4 for most people.
 
Upvote 0
It'll be interesting to see how much this cannibalizes the 70-200 f/4.

Losing the 50mm on the long end here is likely a smaller sacrifice for most users than losing the 4mm on the wide end of the 24-105 f/4 vs the 28-70.

With modern bodies, cropping in from 150-200 in exchange for an extra stop is likely a sound decision for most users. Unless the STM is markedly slower than the AF in the 70-200 f/4 I think it'd be hard to recommend the f/4 for most people.
This will depend on:
- Its sharpness (won't easy to beat the 70-200 f/4)
- The photographer's preferences (lighter lens or longer focal, need for a higher luminosity or not)
- Its build quality (again, the 70-200 is hard to match)
- Price, weather resistance etc...
I know for sure that I'll keep my ultra compact 70-200, since I often use 200mm, and usually at f/5,6. I don't often need wide apertures.
If the new lens started at 50mm, I might give it a try, since in cities 15-35 and 50-150 would make a really nice pair, (plus 24 TS!).
And no, I'm not interested in the Sony 50-150, it weighs 1,4 kg. and needs a :sick: Sony camera body.
PS: If you can crop 150mm, you can also crop 200mm...
 
Upvote 0
I got the 28-70 with my R8, and saving almost $1200 was awesome. I\'d rather have a shorter focal distance and cheaper price lens from the same manufacturer, knowing that my focus is spot on every time, than a third-party one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0