vlim said:What is this lens? I thought they already had a lens that was 120-300 2.8 with OS? I have the 120-300 2.8 non OS and I know there was already a newer version out? I'm very confused....
Same new version with a very few changes...
vlim said:What is this lens? I thought they already had a lens that was 120-300 2.8 with OS? I have the 120-300 2.8 non OS and I know there was already a newer version out? I'm very confused....
Same new version with a very few changes...
vlim said:Beside a new cosmetic treatment, it's the exact same 120-300 launched in 2011, no mechanic or optic change
But a very good lens, very sharp ! only con, pretty heavy...
Excepting the price, of course. The old version has dropped to $3,000, the new version will be at least $3500.vlim said:What is this lens? I thought they already had a lens that was 120-300 2.8 with OS? I have the 120-300 2.8 non OS and I know there was already a newer version out? I'm very confused....
Same new version with a very few changes...
The price was added to the article at a later stagedilbert said:Am I on the only one that read the entire story and saw this line (it appears twice in the story):
Preorder the Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 DG OS HSM for $3599
Has the weight been confirmed somewhere or is that the previous version?max said:It is definitely gonna be heavier (2.8kg vs 1,5kg)
Mt Spokane Photography said:Excepting the price, of course. The old version has dropped to $3,000, the new version will be at least $3500.vlim said:What is this lens? I thought they already had a lens that was 120-300 2.8 with OS? I have the 120-300 2.8 non OS and I know there was already a newer version out? I'm very confused....
Same new version with a very few changes...