Specifications for Unnamed EOS R APS-C Camera Body

I'm kind of thinking that I'd want something that improves on the R7 in terms of maintaining pixel density and getting even better high ISO results. I realize that there are just physical limitations to how far you can go with that, but a little improvement in that area would be a positive thing.

Seems, though, like higher pixel density isn't in the cards. Oh well...
 
Upvote 0
Has Canon ever brought a camera in a lineup where the new camera had a lower resolution than the predecessor? I can't remember one.
So the R7 II falls away for me, I guess it will be the RC. We allready have great full frame video bodies (R5 II, R5C, C80, C400) but actually no APS-C camera (except the C70) in the "cinema" lineup.

But I also hope for the R7 II to be brought out soon!
The R8 has fewer MP than the RP, but it does resolve more detail :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The R8 has fewer MP than the RP, but it does resolve more detail :)
As much as some believe that the R8 is the successor to the RP, Canon Japan still hasn't discontinued the RP (https://personal.canon.jp/product/camera/eos/old-products) so they still believe that it is a separate line and has been for a number of years. Besides the initial RP price, it has been substantially cheaper than the R8 for a long time now indicating a different market segment.
In the R mount space, Canon has formally discontinued the R/Ra/R6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Well, yes it's true that 8K UHD (technically "UHDTV2") is 7680 × 4320 which is 33177600 or "33 MP", but an "8K" hybrid camera sensor would still have to be 45 MP to support 8K DCI video combined with a 3:2 aspect ratio for photography.
As far as I know, Sony doesn't support 8K DCI for their hybrid cameras and there hasn't been any complaints that I have seen. Nor any complaints that they don't support raw recording without codecs.
Imagine that the R5 came out originally with only raw light codecs and no DCI leading to less overheating. Having 8K in any hybrid was simply not enough for the fanbois. Even now, overheating is a common issue and reviewers are more about how long before overheating vs no overheating at all. Cook the internal chips if needed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Call it RMini, separate EVF module(with another hotshoe built-on) to turn it into RM pro. A separate battery grip with high power/high voltage to unlock cooling for 7k/8k and extra fps, which turns it into RM pro max. :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
If you consider the 1DX a successor to the 1Ds3, then I think that might be the only instance (1Ds3: 21 MP, 1DX: 18 MP) in recent memory.
That's a very big if. I think it makes more sense to think of the 1Dx as the FF successor to the 1D4 because the Nikon D3 had made APS-H professional cameras obsolete. There was no successor to the 1Ds3 because the 5D3 5D2 had made the 1Ds3 extremely difficult to sell. Go to DP Review and read Barney Britton's description of the D3 introduction.

Nikon discovered the same issue with the D3X. It was replaced after 4 years by the D800: 50% more pixels, a less rugged body and a 60% price reduction.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Has Canon ever brought a camera in a lineup where the new camera had a lower resolution than the predecessor? I can't remember one.
So the R7 II falls away for me, I guess it will be the RC. We allready have great full frame video bodies (R5 II, R5C, C80, C400) but actually no APS-C camera (except the C70) in the "cinema" lineup.

But I also hope for the R7 II to be brought out soon!
6dII -> R6 and RP to R8?
 
Upvote 0