Trouble is, if something goes wrong, Canon Europe won't help.
PS: with 15 lenses and 3 bodies, I never had one single warranty issue. So, if I ever go to Hong Kong, I might be tempted...
Upvote
0
Trouble is, if something goes wrong, Canon Europe won't help.
I agree with your pointTrouble is, if something goes wrong, Canon Europe won't help.
PS: with 15 lenses and 3 bodies, I never had one single warranty issue. So, if I ever go to Hong Kong, I might be tempted...
The Fuji is indeed a great value!I agree with your point
The link I provided used to be a static website for HK prices 15 years ago.
It has evolved into a dynamic pricelist for multiple official and grey market dealers.
I have a long time dealer I trust back in 2009. So I use the pricelist as a baseline for negotiations for domestic & international dealers.
Last night I did a price study for a possible future purchase
FUJIFILM GFX 50S II + 35-70mm Lens Kit
- $3,527.64 = HK$27,690: HK grey market price + ₱3,600 shipping no VAT, GST or sales tax
- $3,811.78 = ₱216,585.40: FujiFilm PH 12% VAT inc
- $4,499: BH Photo + sales tax
The price difference was $220.
For that sum the service center's 24km from me with a official warranty rather than having it shipped via air both ways at my expense.
Sadly the FujiFilm PH price appears to be a Lazada promo. To think for less than the US price of a EOS R5 body I get a newer 50+ megapixel medium format body + a 27-55mm full frame equivalent zoom lens.
U mean in the EF LineUp? Of course - a lot. If u consider the RF24-105/4L with a price tag of about 1.5k "mid", then there is a really huge list of EF L Zoom and Prime lenses below this price point. Even some f/2.8 ones.Has Canon ever released L quality lenses at mid-price levels besides the RF24-105/4L kit lens?
The pricing of the 24-105mm F4L was mid-level when it came out. In Germany, retail Price was 1.199 € and as a kit lens 999 €. Furthermore, you were able to get cashback on it. I got my copy in march 2019 for 800 € (kit lens - 10% from the retailer - cashback).U mean in the EF LineUp? Of course - a lot. If u consider the RF24-105/4L with a price tag of about 1.5k "mid", then there is a really huge list of EF L Zoom and Prime lenses below this price point. Even some f/2.8 ones.
I got mine for Euro 760 in Italy (after cashback), and was quite shocked seeing it now for 1499...The pricing of the 24-105mm F4L was mid-level when it came out. In Germany, retail Price was 1.199 € and as a kit lens 999 €. Furthermore, you were able to get cashback on it. I got my copy in march 2019 for 800 € (kit lens - 10% from the retailer - cashback).
I think a lot of early adopters therefore have the 24-105mm as mid level pricing in mind.
After covid struck, the price for this lens reached insane levels. I saw it for 1.649 € in one store and people advertising it as “on sale for only 1.499 €”.
I’m sooo glad I got in 2019. It used to be my “most used lens” and until I got the 15-35mm. This lens noticeably outresolves the 24-105mm imho @24mm, @28mm and 35mm
I was shopping around for a standard zoom recently and noticed that I had the price alert on the RF24-105 F4L set to €999, which won't get triggered with the current prices.The pricing of the 24-105mm F4L was mid-level when it came out. In Germany, retail Price was 1.199 € and as a kit lens 999 €. Furthermore, you were able to get cashback on it. I got my copy in march 2019 for 800 € (kit lens - 10% from the retailer - cashback).
I think a lot of early adopters therefore have the 24-105mm as mid level pricing in mind.
After covid struck, the price for this lens reached insane levels. I saw it for 1.649 € in one store and people advertising it as “on sale for only 1.499 €”.
I’m sooo glad I got in 2019. It used to be my “most used lens” and until I got the 15-35mm. This lens noticeably outresolves the 24-105mm imho @24mm, @28mm and 35mm
Or Canon knows who they are & know what they are and priced appropriately because of very strong demand.The Fuji is indeed a great value!
I wonder about the actual size of that market, though. A few years ago in an interview, a Leica exec stated that the entire global medium format (not just Leica's share) comprised about 7,000 cameras per year. That struck me as low, but if true it's a teeny tiny market.Or Canon knows who they are & know what they are and priced appropriately because of very strong demand.
If I was married with kids and never shot birds or sports this would be the system I'd get as it has these characteristics
- R5 & R3 equivalent pricing
- RF L lens equivalent pricing
- 0.79x crop medium format
It would not be a surprise that Hassleblad, PhaseOne, Leica and even Pentax will collectively be less than 50% of the future medium format market.
And - my guess - 30 to 100 a year for the Leica S. According ,even to Leica dealers, very hard to sell...I wonder about the actual size of that market, though. A few years ago in an interview, a Leica exec stated that the entire global medium format (not just Leica's share) comprised about 7,000 cameras per year. That struck me as low, but if true it's a teeny tiny market.
Oh ok didn't knew that. But if I u don't consider cash back and other advertising prices (because they can apply to other lenses aswell) - there would also be some other L lenses still. The 17-40 f/4 (ok - maybe not as excellent as others but I still ok)and the 70-200 f/4 non IS are currently at 600€ here in Germany. the EF 24-70 f/4 L currently is at 1200€ but I am pretty sure this was a lot cheaper too in the past and is, for what it is, an excellent lens. The EF 100 L Macro is also around 1k. If u look in the past ull find even more.The pricing of the 24-105mm F4L was mid-level when it came out. In Germany, retail Price was 1.199 € and as a kit lens 999 €. Furthermore, you were able to get cashback on it. I got my copy in march 2019 for 800 € (kit lens - 10% from the retailer - cashback).
I think a lot of early adopters therefore have the 24-105mm as mid level pricing in mind.
After covid struck, the price for this lens reached insane levels. I saw it for 1.649 € in one store and people advertising it as “on sale for only 1.499 €”.
I’m sooo glad I got in 2019. It used to be my “most used lens” and until I got the 15-35mm. This lens noticeably outresolves the 24-105mm imho @24mm, @28mm and 35mm
There's a big gap in the pricing, but that doesn't mean it's economic for them to fill it. There was always a gulf between the cheaper big whites (300 f/4L and 400 f/5.6L) and the big ones, and that was never addressed during the EF era.Lower prices than L series doesn’t mean low price full stop. The RF 35mm f1.8 goes for £529 here in the UK and the EF 35mm f1.4 L II goes for £2099
There’s room in between those for a new RF prime at f1.4
Leica's market research may be rooted at their price points.I wonder about the actual size of that market, though. A few years ago in an interview, a Leica exec stated that the entire global medium format (not just Leica's share) comprised about 7,000 cameras per year. That struck me as low, but if true it's a teeny tiny market.
I love and continue to use my EF 85mm f/1.4 IS with my R5. At the rate things are going, that's going to be my last EF lens, and then I can just leave the control ring on it permanently.still no RF 85 1.4
Maybe it's going to be super-distorted like the 16mm, so you're going to want to throw out the corners at 12mm anyway?16mm/1.8 would be great but we do have the 16/2.8 already.
I would prefer a 14mm over a 12mm as I assume that the price will be very high for the 12/1.8
A lot of us have been clamoring for one since the beginning of the R system. Maybe Canon harvests EXIF data from the internet and maybe there's a decent number of shots/interest in Sigma's 28mm f/1.4 and that is driving it. At least, that would be my hope.I tend to agree. I wonder if some ‘source’ is basing this on a lens patent. For example, there was a patent with four f/2.8 primes (10, 14, 16, and 20mm) that published in June. CRguy erroneously called them APS-C lenses, but the 16/2.8 in that patent was the one that was already a product by then. Similarly, a few weeks ago a patent published on three wide f/1.8 primes (21, 24 and 28mm), CRguy again mistakenly called them APS-C lenses but one of them was the RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro that was announced the month before.
This is something I was wondering...is it possible to go RF extender > RF Adapter > EF lens, and get full AF/etc.? I haven't tried it yet...Actually, I have to scratch that. I just noticed that the RF 24 f/1.8 has the same shit optical correction as the RF 16.
In that case, I think I would rather have the Sigma 28mm f/1.4 as my next wide angle prime. It's faster, has basically no distortion, and still great sharpness. Also, since I can use it with the RF TCs that option will allow me to fill out even more slots in my current lens options since I can also use it as a 39mm f/2.0 or a 56mm f/2.8.
Damn, this locked in walled garden Canon system really chafes, I can never seem to select a third party option when I don't like what Canon is giving us.
oh wait....
The HK based "grey" exporter that I've used for the last 10 years, sells at about 25% cheaper on average, compared to buying from a Canon Europe approved dealer. Over the years, it has saved me literally thousands of pounds.Trouble is, if something goes wrong, Canon Europe won't help.
PS: with 15 lenses and 3 bodies, I never had one single warranty issue. So, if I ever go to Hong Kong, I might be tempted...
"A lot of us," when 'us' refers to a small handful of people, is irrelevant.A lot of us have been clamoring for one since the beginning of the R system. Maybe Canon harvests EXIF data from the internet and maybe there's a decent number of shots/interest in Sigma's 28mm f/1.4 and that is driving it. At least, that would be my hope.