Nope, the difference between 18-24MP would not be significant. My list was supposed to show possible sensor types and should not be a proposal to sell all of them.
True and pointed out quite well, eight different models would be too much. I should have worded it differently and mention that two options would be nice and these are ideas I could think of (the eight I listed)
As far as I know, no Canon FF mirrorless has ever used a Sony sensor.
Does anyone really need 60MP?
Simple 2x binning in both X & Y would take us from 60Mp to 15Mp. 60>30Mp would require a funky sqrt(2):1 filtering function in X&Y.
I wholeheartedly agree with this. As much as I enjoy my r3, r5 and r5c as professional workhorses they are not an every-day carry item. Nothing could ever replace big professional heavy glass like an 85 1.2 but I am quite desperate for something refreshed and truly pocketable that bridges the gap between an iPhone and a pro level camera like the G5X Mk II.
Canon bodies tend to be more expensive but the glass tends to be *somewhat* less. It kinda evens out in the end, however. Neither system is cheap until you get to lower-priced APS-C units.If I recall right, in the past 20 years, Canon was never (?) trying to beat Nikon with lower prices.
Most of the time, Canon was more expensive.
‘Enough’ doesn’t sell cameras. ‘More’ sells cameras. It doesn’t matter whether or not people think it’s enough (whatever it is), manufacturers will always offer more.
Yes, you are right! But what happens with the IQ in the process? If you increase just the numeric (huh, and it's connected with the price too!) and it doesn't deliver? Fortunately most of the increased "numerics" are delivering and in my own terminology it says: step up! How many "steps up it needs to get it really different - ask the guys who create that and the custumers are the judges!) The world of photography is huge and really (naturally!) divers! I think when the manufacturers are offering "more" it's good - at least if that "more" is visible in your photos!!! If some guys don't need some of the "numerics" they are not obligated to buy the new camera (like someone shooting in studio with controlled light and distance - just one of the examples!). The computers and the programs for developing your (RAW) photos are going in unison with the trend (and especially the computers/monitors are getting way chipper in the process!). And yes: I'm talking from the point of view of wild-life shooter but I believe it's not hardly connected only to that category!
I shoot 20mp and 90% of the time it is more than enough. Even for pretty big prints. But there are times with wildlife I would like 60mp for the cropping ability
What's the percentage of 8k screens "installed" in the market, considering desktop, laptop, mobile and tv? I'm pretty sure it's in the ballpark of 1%-2% max, probably much less then that, like ten times less.
