Canon: No Plans for High Resolution R1

Actually, Canon only offers the R5 series with "higher" resolution (including pixel shift). All the others are ~24mp bar the RP with 26mp and R7 with 32mp.
Yes, there are lots of options from other OEMs with 40+mp.

What is clear is that Canon doesn't believe that there is a profitable market for a R5 with an integrated grip/fancy AF controller/ dual CFe cards/etc.
Although they were happy to include the same eye-AF controller and separate AF processor from the R1 series in the R5ii.

Personally, I think that Canon should test the market eg current R5ii or integrated grip R5ii and remove the 3 grips from the range.
I find it weird that they provide the extended battery life, heat management etc options but not putting it all together. An integrated grip R5ii would have a significantly higher price though.
My guess is Canon has determined it is more profitable to sell R5 & R6 series with the optional series of grips.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Petapixel has spoken with Go Tokura (VP of Canon's imaging division) at CP+ and posting the results in bits and pieces. Today they have a post on sensor development:
"If we were to simply develop a high-resolution camera, that would be possible. However, if we try to develop a 100-megapixel camera using current technology, I believe we would have to compromise on many other performance factors, such as high sensitivity performance, continuous shooting performance, rolling shutter distortion, image transfer speed, and video recording time. If we do not want to compromise, the price of the camera body will skyrocket, and considering heat dissipation measures and other factors, it may not fit into a size that allows for comfortable shooting. The technology for high-resolution sensors does exist, and we have it, but the challenge lies in the commercialization of a viable product. That is why we believe it is still premature.”.

See: https://petapixel.com/2025/03/17/canon-commits-to-continuing-in-house-sensor-development/
I agree (obviously) that increasing resolution would have adverse impacts on speed, everything else being equal.
I would accept slower FPS and lesser video for the sake of higher detail (at low ISO - at high ISO I would accept higher pixel-level noise, especially since the recent advances in AI NR).

That's me, personally, as we've discussed at length... So if we accept the compromises, why not Canon? In the end it would be a specialized tool, same as the current R1 is, just with a different flair.

But, alas, clearly my happiness does not matter to the evil Canon corporate lackeys :cry:
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The R3 is the true value flagship! ;)
My vote is still for the R100 as flagship. It’s the only Canon without an AA filter, and as Sony, Nikon, Fuji et al will tell you, that’s an important advantage for quality and resolution.
(It might be cheaper to produce as well, but that doesn’t alter any of the above).
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Nope! The R100 is the technology flagship!
Yes indeed. The absence of the AA filter means it’s the only Canon that can match the (AA-less) opposition head to head. The fact that it’s probably cheaper to build a sensor without the alias filter has nothing to do with it.
(And it doesn’t overheat - unless you put it into a hot oven which doesn’t count).
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
How about V1?
Well, it has a 1 in the name so it must be the flagship PowerShot camera. About time, it's been >20 years since the last PowerShot flagship camera. Not sure, though. It doesn't have a hyphen in the name. I thought all Canon flagships needed a hyphen. The V1 doesn't have an L-series lens, whereas the Pro1 did.

Flagship.png

Oh, wait...the Pro1 only had 8 MP and the PowerShot V1 has 22 MP. But the 8 MP sensor was made by Sony, and they know what a real flagship is. So now I'm thoroughly baffled. Is the PowerShot with the better lens the P&S flagship, or is the camera with more MP the real flagship?

Maybe there is no true flagship. Damn Canon for constantly and randomly changing the definition of 'flagship'. It's hard to keep up. :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Well, it has a 1 in the name so it must be the flagship PowerShot camera. About time, it's been >20 years since the last PowerShot flagship camera. Not sure, though. It doesn't have a hyphen in the name. I thought all Canon flagships needed a hyphen. The V1 doesn't have an L-series lens, whereas the Pro1 did.

View attachment 222917

Oh, wait...the Pro1 only had 8 MP and the PowerShot V1 has 22 MP. But the 8 MP sensor was made by Sony, and they know what a real flagship is. So now I'm thoroughly baffled. Is the PowerShot with the better lens the P&S flagship, or is the camera with more MP the real flagship?

Maybe there is no true flagship. Damn Canon for constantly and randomly changing the definition of 'flagship'. It's hard to keep up. :ROFLMAO:
V1 doesn't go down well here because too many came over in 1944-5.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
My guess is Canon has determined it is more profitable to sell R5 & R6 series with the optional series of grips.
Yes but there can also be other constraints as well.
R&D resources, manufacturing capacity, part availability, resources for regulatory compliance and costs of maintaining separate SKUs (packaging, inventory, etc). Irrespective, strategic direction can be a hard driver as well with probably as many internal discussions about what to offer in the future. I assume that the Apple car was meant to be profitable until it wasn't.

An integrated body R6 is probably too close to the R3 so I wouldn't expect that to be released.
An integrated R5ii body would be something else entirely.... Maybe with the R5s :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
If you follow Mike's definition, the grip isn't important nor is having a sensor. After all, isn't a sphere all around, too?
While a grip may not be necessary in a camera that a pro can grab and know it will meet their needs regardless of what the job requires, I'm pretty sure a sensor is.

If you're going to put words in my mouth, assuming I'm the Mike you meant, at least make them ones I'd say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Petapixel has spoken with Go Tokura (VP of Canon's imaging division) at CP+ and posting the results in bits and pieces. Today they have a post on sensor development:
"If we were to simply develop a high-resolution camera, that would be possible. However, if we try to develop a 100-megapixel camera using current technology, I believe we would have to compromise on many other performance factors, such as high sensitivity performance, continuous shooting performance, rolling shutter distortion, image transfer speed, and video recording time.
Interesting that he talked about quadrupling the number of pixels being the point where there is compromise needed and not the level of the R5.
 
Upvote 0
Nor am I. I suspect it’s driven by product registration, here at least.
(y) I always tell my Dealer to do this stuff, I didn’t register my cameras and lenses.
I guess that’s why I was not asked for a survey.

BTW CPS Members now need to buy the stuff from normal dealers in Switzerland , there’s no direct sale from Canon anymore.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
While a grip may not be necessary in a camera that a pro can grab and know it will meet their needs regardless of what the job requires, I'm pretty sure a sensor is.

If you're going to put words in my mouth, assuming I'm the Mike you meant, at least make them ones I'd say.
My apologies, I was following your logic about the flagship film camera... So now those were not flagships? I don't want to put words in your mouth! What exactly were you saying?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0