So I am (pretty much) the exact target demo for this camera and I’m curious if anyone else is having the same first impressions as me. I’m getting caught up with the size, did anyone else think it was going to be smaller than it is?
camerasize.com
It’s about the same size as the ZV-E1, the Fuji X-M5 is smaller than it. Of course you need to factor in the lens which is a big consideration, but there are actually good pancake options now, and the kit zoom the X-M5 comes with is very competent and small.
I’m strictly a video shooter and have been chasing the dream daily carry/travel pocketable video camera for a long time: as good of IQ as I can get in as small a form factor as possible. Every mm counts here. I’ve been waiting with bated breath and constantly checking for the newest rumours in anticipation of the V1 as it was seemingly on track to check the most of my boxes. Now that it’s here, it’s actually exceeded expectations - not only does it have everything that was rumoured, it also has ND?! And a cooling fan?!
So all of that makes me very happy. But leading up to the release, the rumours were framing the V1 as a replacement to the G7 series, so I was expecting a body that would be a similar size to that. Retroactively I can see how this was super misguided with the bigger sensor and everything. But I feel the size makes it a harder choice for people like me.
I’m putting aside price considerations here, the V1’s big strength is clearly how competitive it is at its price point. For almost the same price though, and some trade offs, you have the X-M5 - you get an APS-C sensor, smaller body, interchangeable lenses, open gate 6k. If you don’t mind the size of the V1, you can carry a ZV-E1 instead and get full frame, keep ibis. Of course you need to either carry more lenses or live on a fixed focal, that’s obviously the big con.
Am I thinking about this wrong? Just curious if anyone else is thinking along these same lines and what your thoughts are!
Compare camera dimensions side by side
It’s about the same size as the ZV-E1, the Fuji X-M5 is smaller than it. Of course you need to factor in the lens which is a big consideration, but there are actually good pancake options now, and the kit zoom the X-M5 comes with is very competent and small.
I’m strictly a video shooter and have been chasing the dream daily carry/travel pocketable video camera for a long time: as good of IQ as I can get in as small a form factor as possible. Every mm counts here. I’ve been waiting with bated breath and constantly checking for the newest rumours in anticipation of the V1 as it was seemingly on track to check the most of my boxes. Now that it’s here, it’s actually exceeded expectations - not only does it have everything that was rumoured, it also has ND?! And a cooling fan?!
So all of that makes me very happy. But leading up to the release, the rumours were framing the V1 as a replacement to the G7 series, so I was expecting a body that would be a similar size to that. Retroactively I can see how this was super misguided with the bigger sensor and everything. But I feel the size makes it a harder choice for people like me.
I’m putting aside price considerations here, the V1’s big strength is clearly how competitive it is at its price point. For almost the same price though, and some trade offs, you have the X-M5 - you get an APS-C sensor, smaller body, interchangeable lenses, open gate 6k. If you don’t mind the size of the V1, you can carry a ZV-E1 instead and get full frame, keep ibis. Of course you need to either carry more lenses or live on a fixed focal, that’s obviously the big con.
Am I thinking about this wrong? Just curious if anyone else is thinking along these same lines and what your thoughts are!
Upvote
0