Canon EOS R50 V Specifications

Why should Canon always "cripple" something? Why is something "crippled" at all?

If I did read your post right, I interpret some sarcasm into it. I hope I am right.
So maybe I'm opening a can of worms here that doesn't even exist.

But maybe people should start thinking about the use of some words, that might be critical.
Not directly addressed to you, Bonich, and no accuse, but in general I think the whole world would be a lot better, if we start to be more polite again.

I know, I do a lot of that "Canon is doomed" stuff as well, but IMO "doomed" is something else than "crippled".
But maybe I should rethink my point of view as well. :unsure:

Sorry for the rant, but I had to let that out.
I read it as total sarcasm, personally – intended as a humorous way to correct the labeling of the announced-tomorrow RF 20/1.4L VCM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
It also takes RF lenses.
And typically, you pair a small lightweight and sub 1k$ body with a heavy and big lens over 1.4k$ (OEM)... sure :p

I always advocate the use of good (and sometimes expensive) glass, but I also have realistic and useful relations in mind.
But okay... go and pair the R50V with one of the VCM lenses - or even better, with the RF85/1.2 :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0