The EVF-DC2 has about 20 pins, the multifunction shoe has only 15. You'd need the AD-E1 adapter to fire a 3rd party flash trigger. The Canon ST-E10 will work for Canon RT flashes. Personally, I use the ST-E10 or EL-5 on-camera to trigger Canon RT flashes and optically slave the monolight.Ok I was only interested in EVF contacts. But yes interesting, how is this supposed to trigger my studio lights.
View attachment 223029
I count about 20 in that image, but the resolution is limiting.has about 20 pins
The target market for this camera has no idea who that is.Luigi Colani
It definitely carries over at least HDR-PQ from the R50 providing at least minimal / entry-level 10 bit. The rumor lit does refer to HDR/c.log view assist, but it's not clear whether that's just for HDR-PQ or whether there will be something more.Any sign of 10 bit video or any form of C-Log?
Fair point. The Canon accessories (at least the ones that I have, ST-E10, EL-5 and AD-E1) only have 15 pins but it does look like the shoe has more slots than that (future proofing?).I count about 20 in that image, but the resolution is limiting.
Electronic Viewfinder EVF-DC2/EVF-DC1 cannot be attached to the multi-function shoe. Attempting to attach the accessories by force may damage them or the multi-function shoe.
I'm fine with a new one, but the old one is better than none.Having said that, maybe the R50 V will have a different multifunction shoe that will allow the old EVFs to work with it. I wouldn't hold my breath for that. But Canon may come out with a new one for people to buy...
Ok I was only interested in EVF contacts. But yes interesting, how is this supposed to trigger my studio lights.
View attachment 223029
That's the great thing about product diversity.I like this better compared to the old R50 or R100—they felt useless. ...
Thanks for the cliché.And then this new cripple-hammered kit lens.
Trolls did the absolute minimum with the comments again. Disappointing you always.Canon did the absolute minimum with the lens again. Disappointing you always.
Well, the R10 does exist. I would choose it over the R50/R100 any day. The R50V fills an ultracompact body niche, instead of being a castrated version of the R10. And this adds real diversity.That's the great thing about product diversity.
What is useless to you, helps me to make great pictures (not the R100).
And what you like better has (almost) useless ergonomics to me
Great, that Canon offers now both to us - just an attachable EVF is missing
I considered that as well. But having the R6m2 as main body, I was searching for the smallest with the option of an EVF, because in a lot of situations, I need one.Well, the R10 does exist.
The more choice the better for us. But naming the R50 in the same "value" as the R100 is really not fairI would choose it over the R50/R100 any day.
"Crippled", "castrated" - I don't get why people nowadays use such negative wording so often.The R50V fills an ultracompact body niche, instead of being a castrated version of the R10. And this adds real diversity.